RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are

[Phil Corwin <pcorwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ICA certainly believes it is a worthy topic for BC consideration.



Philip S. Corwin
Partner
Butera & Andrews
1301 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Suite 500
Washington, DC 20004

202-347-6875 (office)

202-347-6876 (fax)

202-255-6172 (cell)

"Luck is the residue of design." -- Branch Rickey

________________________________
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Susan 
Kawaguchi [skawaguchi@xxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:30 PM
To: Matkowsky, Jonathan; marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; 
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are

I agree with Jonathan domain portfolio management issues are critical to most 
businesses I think the BC focuses on some of the issues that impact management 
such as WHOIS, registrar compliance with the RAA, registrar and registry 
security etc.   I know there are other issues I face with managing a portfolio 
that are not addressed in the BC.

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Matkowsky, Jonathan
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:22 PM
To: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are

I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business concerns.

________________________________
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>; John Berard 
<john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are
I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think John 
is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss different 
ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance.
....   and yes, I will put in a
discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties to 
participate, consult, etc.





> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
> From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain
> portflio management was a joke.
>
> Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
>
> Philip
>
>
> > Marilyn,
> > As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better
> > reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors
> > used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN
> > finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket:
> > To prevent:
> > FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
> >
> > To promote:
> > Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk
> > managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks
> > From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate
> > with companies.
> > Just some raw material for consideration.
> > Berard
> >
>
>
[THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE 
OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE.  IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT 
THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR 
DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY 
DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY 
PROHIBITED.  IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY 
NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE MESSAGE. 
 THANK YOU.]