Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
- To: Susan Kawaguchi <skawaguchi@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:13:27 -0500
first time back on the 'net since the meetings (a great trip to Machu Picchu,
but no internet access to speak of).
i'd like to join this bandwagon -- my portfolio is small, but it means a lot to
me and that's the reason i've been so involved with the endless ongoing series
of Inter Registrar Transfer Policy Transfer (IRTP) working groups.
On Dec 10, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Susan Kawaguchi wrote:
> I agree with Jonathan domain portfolio management issues are critical to most
> businesses I think the BC focuses on some of the issues that impact
> management such as WHOIS, registrar compliance with the RAA, registrar and
> registry security etc. I know there are other issues I face with managing a
> portfolio that are not addressed in the BC.
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Matkowsky, Jonathan
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:22 PM
> To: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; philip.sheppard@xxxxxx; john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
> I think domain portfolio management is one of many important business
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>; John Berard
> Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thu Dec 09 12:18:00 2010
> Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Who we are
> I agree, domain name portfolio management isn't a BC issue per se./I think
> John is 'brainstorming' and we will just gather ideas and actually discuss
> different ideas later/I would add SSR, for instance.
> .... and yes, I will put in a
> discussion about accountability of officers/councilors, including the duties
> to participate, consult, etc.
> > Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:27:27 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Who we are
> > From: philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> > To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > CC: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> > I hope the proposal that the Bc mission is rewritten to promite domain
> > portflio management was a joke.
> > Here's another one. What exactly is our councillor recall procedure ????
> > Philip
> > > Marilyn,
> > > As we consider a rewrite of the Business Constituency's mission to better
> > > reflect who we are, we might begin with a review of the self-descriptors
> > > used in the round of introductions at our meeting with the new ICANN
> > > finance team. The characteristics fell in two bucket:
> > > To prevent:
> > > FraudBrand abuseMalwarePhishingCybersquattingBarriers to e.commerce
> > >
> > > To promote:
> > > Domain portfolio managementTechnology architectureRisk
> > > managementInnovationEfficiencySecurityEasier e.commerceIP rightsTrademarks
> > > From this, we can build a case for membership in the BC that may resonate
> > > with companies.
> > > Just some raw material for consideration.
> > > Berard
> > >
> [THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
> USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE
> IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IS NOT THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE
> FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY
> DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY
> PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY
> NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE OR REPLY BY E-MAIL AND THEN PROMPTLY DELETE THE
> MESSAGE. THANK YOU.]
- - - - - - - - -
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)