<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Webpage on ICANN Board-GAC consultaiton
- To: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Webpage on ICANN Board-GAC consultaiton
- From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:06:46 -0500
in response to a member's question, if we do the call, we will use an ICANN
bridge with toll free dial in. Another member suggested they would prefer a
short summary /with 'insights' via email from the BC team on ground.
That could be a better use of BC members in attendance, as long as we all
gather and jointly draft comments.
Let me check with the BC members who registered to see if they can commit to
drafting, or would find a call lessonerous to do.
Marilyn
From:
owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marilyn
Cade
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011
1:30 PM
To: Benedetta Rossi; bc - GNSO
list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Webpage on
ICANN Board-GAC consultaiton
> A webpage has been created for the ICANN Board-GAC consultation for Brussels.
>
> http://meetings.icann.org/board-gac-spring11
>
For information for members, I'll publish the list of BC attendees when they
are fully confirmed with Benedetta. IF you are registered
to attend in-person, please let Benedetta know.
IF you are committed to participating on line and want to
keep in touch with those of us on site, can you also let her know that?
OPTION TO CHECK UP WITH MEMBERS ON SITE FOR FEEDBACK:
Finally, would members want to have a 'home team' call for
30 minutes at the end of day one, to share any insider perspectives
from discussions in the halls, private exchanges,
etc.?
IF so, I'll ask Chris to arrange a conference bridge for
such a short update check in with the members. It would be around
6 or 7 p.m. in Europe, I
suspect.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|