<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for 2012
- To: "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for 2012
- From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:30:43 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Steve,</div><div><br></div><div>These comments read well
to me. I have but three suggestions, all of which are more nuance than
substance.</div><div><br></div><div>First, in the WhoIs section, can we not
give a nod to the view of the NCUC that for some people (e.g., dissidents in
dangerous places), privacy is essential? I think the WhoIs database(s)
ought to be accurate and secure. I am a big fan of tightly controlling
access and the use of serious authentication
protocols.</div><div><br></div><div>Second, I think we go too far in asking
ICANN to spend money on itself. I realize compliance is an essential
function, but less "pretty please" and more "ICANN's reputation
requires."</div><div><br></div><div>Third, communications has many
meanings. I would make sure we are clear in our meaning each time the
word is used in the document.</div><div><br></div><div>That's is from (still
rainy) San
Francisco.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Berard<br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black;
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for<br>
2012<br>
From: Steve DelBianco <<a
href="mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
Date: Mon, March 21, 2011 7:16 pm<br>
To: "<a href="mailto:bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx";>bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx</a>" <<a
href="mailto:bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx";>bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
<br>
<div><div><div>ICANN is now gathering public comment on its proposed framework
for FY 2012 operating plan and
budget.</div></div></div><div><br></div><div>Attached is a discussion draft for
BC comments prepared by Chris Chaplow, our Vice Chair for Finance &
Administration. </div><div><br></div><div>(Those of you in San
Francisco last week heard Chris summarize these comments in the Public Forum on
Thursday. )</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"
style="font-family: Arial;">ICANN's Comment period closes 4-April, so today
(21-March) begins our 14-day review period for this discussion
draft.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
Arial;"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span"
style="font-family: Arial;">Please review and post your suggestions/edits as
soon as possible. If there are no disagreements noted by 30-March, these
comments will be adopted without a voting period, and posted to ICANN on
4-April.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
Arial;"><br></span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span"
face="Calibri,sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:
Arial;">For topic background, see </span></font><font
class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><a target="_blank"
href="http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2012";>http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2012</a></font></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks
again to Chris for his leadership on all ICANN financial and administrative
issues.</div><div><div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 12pt;
font-size:12pt;; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"><span style="font-size:
11pt; color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: Calibri,sans-serif;"
lang="EN-US"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);
font-size: 14px; font-family:
Arial,sans-serif;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Steve
DelBianco</div><div>Vice chair for policy
coordination</div><div><br></div></span></span></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|