<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for 2012
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for 2012
- From: <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:32:55 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Mikey,</div><div><br></div><div>Your comment reminded me
of the sales platform adopted by Oracle CEO, Larry Ellison. He often says
IT professionals are just going to have to get used to spending less to get
more done. ICANN should be encouraged to implement technology rather than
need to hire and retain a phalanx of people in support of its mission.
</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>Berard<br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black;
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] Proposed BC comment on ICANN proposed budget for<br>
2012<br>
From: "Mike O'Connor" <<a
href="mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx";>mike@xxxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
Date: Tue, March 22, 2011 5:20 am<br>
To: Steve DelBianco <<a
href="mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
Cc: "<a href="mailto:bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx";>bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx</a>" <<a
href="mailto:bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx";>bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
<br>
great job.<br>
<br>
i would expand our support for Compliance by also mentioning the need for
upgrades to their systems. all those analyses they do for us are basically
done by hand -- they really need an upgrade to their systems to redirect their
staff hours back to real compliance work instead of just being clerks. i'm
attaching the memo that a gaggle of us working-group participants (IRTP and RAP
as i recall) sent to the budget folks a couple years ago. the net result was
no systems and David Giza getting fired. but the issue remains. perhaps even
more important now that new gTLDs are about to arrive…<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
mikey<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Mar 21, 2011, at 9:16 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:<br>
<br>
> ICANN is now gathering public comment on its proposed framework for FY
2012 operating plan and budget.<br>
> <br>
> Attached is a discussion draft for BC comments prepared by Chris Chaplow,
our Vice Chair for Finance & Administration. <br>
> <br>
> (Those of you in San Francisco last week heard Chris summarize these
comments in the Public Forum on Thursday. )<br>
> <br>
> ICANN's Comment period closes 4-April, so today (21-March) begins our
14-day review period for this discussion draft.<br>
> <br>
> Please review and post your suggestions/edits as soon as possible. If
there are no disagreements noted by 30-March, these comments will be adopted
without a voting period, and posted to ICANN on 4-April.<br>
> <br>
> For topic background, see <a
href="http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2012";>http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#op-budget-fy2012</a><br>
> <br>
> Thanks again to Chris for his leadership on all ICANN financial and
administrative issues.<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Steve DelBianco<br>
> Vice chair for policy coordination<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <BC_Comment_FY12Framework-Ops-Plan-Budget[1].doc><br>
<br>
- - - - - - - - -<br>
phone 651-647-6109 <br>
fax 866-280-2356 <br>
web <a href="http://www.haven2.com";>http://www.haven2.com</a><br>
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)<br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|