RE: [bc-gnso] please review: brief BC comment on IRTP-B recommendations

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I support this approach, which states the BC perspective about remanding back 
to the GNSO Council, but with the requirement that it be then remanded to the 
WG, who would be the appropriate party to re examine and develop alternate or 
modified recommendations.
Marilyn Cade, speaking as an individual member of the BC


From: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] please review:  brief BC comment on IRTP-B recommendations
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 12:48:56 +0000












As we noted on our 14-Jul member call, ICANN's Board will soon consider the 
GNSO  PDP recommendations for IRTP-B (inter-Registrar Transfer Policy - Part 
B).   There is now an open public
 comment period for any advice to the Board before they consider the PDP 
recommendations.      See docs and description
here. 









Last week, I suggested that our BC members who were most active on the IRTP 
working group could offer a comment for the BC to submit to the Board.    Mikey 
O'Connor, Berry Cobb, and Chris Chaplow came up with this brief
 comment:








The BC endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B Working Group and 
encourages Board members to vote in favor of the motion as drafted.

 

If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the 
BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the 
IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback and perhaps modify 
recommendations where appropriate.

 














These comments are due 8-Aug, giving us 9 days for review, edits, and approval. 
     This is less than than our customary 14 day review period, but I believe 9 
days is adequate to review a two-sentence
 comment that is based on a previous BC position.














All BC members are invited to suggest edits on the BC list.   







Steve DelBianco
vice chair for policy coordination