<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] RE: A thoughtful piece on new gTLDs
- To: "Smith, Bill" <bill.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: A thoughtful piece on new gTLDs
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:42:40 +0000
Here's another---
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577145132261409846.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsSecond
JANUARY 9, 2012
.
A New Challenge for Web Freedom
A vast increase of top-level domain names will put the Internet's
self-regulating body to a test.
By L. GORDON CROVITZ
The Internet is celebrated as a machine that runs by itself, but this is not
quite accurate. The Web does have oversight, just not by any multinational
organization, national government or regulator. It's run by a small, private,
nonprofit institution that is rarely in the news.
This week will be an exception. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers, known by the acronym Icann, is accepting applications for an infinite
number of new Web addresses, known as top-level domain names. In addition to
the existing two dozen suffixes, such as .com, .org and .net, Icann will let
people apply, for a fee of $185,000, to create whatever suffixes they like,
which will be reviewed and go live next year. Expect .hitachi and .paris, for
example. Icann is also adding local-language Web names in non-Latin characters
such as Chinese and Cyrillic.
Esther Dyson, a technology investor who was the founding chairman of Icann
between 1998 and 2000, has led criticism of these new domains, which she says
will confuse users and create new expenses for companies. She's right that the
immediate beneficiaries will be trademark lawyers fighting over brands and
Internet registries and registrars that will add revenue with new domains.
Ms. Dyson, who at one time supported new domains, told me last week that at
this point in the evolution of the Web, "we cannot create competition-we can
only create redundancy." She asks, "What's wrong with marriott.com versus
marriott.hotels?" She thinks companies will invest defensively to protect
brands as Web suffixes even if they never intend to use them. She predicts
Google could be the big winner if people have to use search engines to find
websites instead of remembering increasingly complex addresses.
In response to this criticism, Icann CEO Rod Beckstrom says new domains will
create more naming options for websites and will support the group's mission of
more competition. He gave me the example of a letter he recently got from the
chief of the Zulus saying that he would apply for the .zulu suffix for use by
members of his tribe, who live across several African countries. The Catalan
community in Spain is similarly using the .cat suffix.
Mr. Beckstrom also makes the good point that there is an inherent disconnect
between trademarks and domains. The trademark system was designed in the
Industrial Age and protects corporate marks only within countries and based on
categories of activity. In contrast, Web domains have to be unique globally, a
problem that having more domains could help resolve. He says a new Icann
clearinghouse for trademarks will ensure that brand holders are protected.
The expansion of Web addresses by Icann has been in the works since 2006, but
Washington only recently got involved. The U.S. has no authority over Icann. So
it made no difference last month when Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D., W.Va.) demanded
that Icann "drastically limit" the number of new domains, or when Federal Trade
Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz said this is a "potential disaster" that will
result in more online fraud.
Icann has been largely insulated from such politics ever since it was formed as
a nonprofit in the late 1990s to take over responsibility from the U.S.
government to maintain the operational stability of the Web. Its
decision-making approach was defined as a "bottom-up, consensus-driven,
democratic manner," which seems to include so many advisory groups-including
governments, registries, other nonprofits, companies and network security
specialists-that no single interest group dominates.
This controversy over domains is a reminder that the Internet is both the
greatest technological advance of our era and also the greatest example of a
self-regulating industry. Ms. Dyson is a critic of the decision to add domains,
but she embraces the limited power of Icann to keep the Web functioning
smoothly without having broader authority such as to take down websites.
"Not having the power is liberating," says Ms. Dyson, who warns against Web
oversight by governments or groups of governments. When asked about lobbying by
the United Nations for control over the Web as an alternative to Icann, Ms.
Dyson correctly calls this a "fate worse than death" and quotes this warning
from a poem by British poet Hilaire Belloc: "Always keep a-hold of Nurse / For
fear of finding something worse."
If the new domains become a gold mine for trademark lawyers, Icann has reserved
the right to narrow the number of new domains it accepts, but this is an issue
for Icann alone to resolve.
The broader lesson is the tribute to Icann that this relatively low-key
controversy over domains is the institution's most divisive issue in years.
Icann proves that a self-regulating body can do its job, if it has limited
powers and isn't burdened by political agendas-even and especially-if it
oversees something as complex, global and valuable as the Internet.
Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Smith, Bill
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 9:13 AM
To: bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] A thoughtful piece on new gTLDs
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-06/name-calling-on-the-internet-is-serious-business-susan-crawford.html
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4130 - Release Date: 01/08/12
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|