<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] FW: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
- To: Chris Chaplow <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] FW: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B Recommendations
- From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:36:09 +0000
Mikey and Chris — following up on today's BC member call.
As our leads on IRTP-B, could you please look at the comment we submitted last
August (below), and edit to fit the current Public Comment opportunity
(Link<http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/irtp-b-rec9-part2-23jan12-en.htm>)?
This comment is due 13-Feb-2012.
Thanks,
Steve
From: Steve DelBianco
<sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:16:54 -0400
To: <irtp-b-recommendations@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:irtp-b-recommendations@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:'bc-GNSO@xxxxxxxxx> GNSO list'"
<bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Business Constituency comment on Board Consideration of IRTP-B
Recommendations
The Business Constituency (BC) endorses the recommendations made by the IRTP-B
Working Group and encourages ICANN Board members to vote in favor of the motion
as drafted.
If Board members have issues which prevent them from supporting the motion, the
BC urges the Board refer the issue back to the GNSO Council which can ask the
IRTP-B working group to review the Board's feedback, and perhaps modify
recommendations where appropriate.
This document was reviewed and approved by BC members in accordance with our
charter.
--
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency
http://Www.bizconst.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|