ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] Business Constituency (BC) comments on SSR Review Team Draft Report

  • To: "ssrt-draft-report@xxxxxxxxx" <ssrt-draft-report@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] Business Constituency (BC) comments on SSR Review Team Draft Report
  • From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:29:05 +0000

Attached are comments of the ICANN Business Constituency (BC), regarding the 
draft report of the SSR Review Team.

These are initial comments of the BC on this draft report, which we acknowledge 
filing during the portion of comment period designated for reply comments.

While the BC supports a two-part comment period, we are finding that the time 
for initial comments should be lengthened.

In addition, we believe that comment periods should be extended whenever an 
ICANN public meeting occurs during the comment period.  Public meetings require 
intense participation for several a days, leaving little time to prepare public 
comments.  A simple solution would be to add 7 days to any public comment 
period that includes dates of an ICANN public meeting.


Steve DelBianco
vice chair for policy coordination, BC












--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482

Attachment: BC Comment on SSR RT.pdf
Description: BC Comment on SSR RT.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy