[bc-gnso] RE: Business Constituency (BC) comments on SSR Review Team Draft Report

["BRUEGGEMAN, JEFF" <jb7454@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks again for all of the efforts that went into producing a thorough and 
substantive set of comments.  As I've mentioned, it will be very helpful to 
have the BC's input as we're finalizing the report, particularly since there 
have not been many comments filed.  The BC's earlier comments helped to shape 
our thinking and prioritize issues within the report.

Jeff

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 3:29 PM
To: ssrt-draft-report@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] Business Constituency (BC) comments on SSR Review Team Draft 
Report

Attached are comments of the ICANN Business Constituency (BC), regarding the 
draft report of the SSR Review Team.

These are initial comments of the BC on this draft report, which we acknowledge 
filing during the portion of comment period designated for reply comments.

While the BC supports a two-part comment period, we are finding that the time 
for initial comments should be lengthened.

In addition, we believe that comment periods should be extended whenever an 
ICANN public meeting occurs during the comment period.  Public meetings require 
intense participation for several a days, leaving little time to prepare public 
comments.  A simple solution would be to add 7 days to any public comment 
period that includes dates of an ICANN public meeting.


Steve DelBianco
vice chair for policy coordination, BC












--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482