RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN Eliminates Board Meetings at ICANN Meetings

[Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike:

I understand that some issues have to be discussed in private. But if the 
starting point was that all Board meetings were virtually open and closure was 
an exception it shouldn't be a big issue to structure meetings so that matters 
held in confidence were dealt with at the beginning or end of each meeting.

Instead the new default position is that all Board meetings take place behind 
closed doors and no transcripts are made available, just condensed "minutes". 
This is not transparency.

Fully agree that full transcripts with appropriate redactions should be made 
available - but I'd raise you one and also ask that mp3 recordings be made 
available, because that would best capture what really went on. And, yes, those 
three closed door meetings that took place in San Jose should have been open to 
public review - sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Best, Philip

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell

Twitter: @VlawDC

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Michael D. Palage
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:26 AM
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ICANN Eliminates Board Meetings at ICANN Meetings

Phil,

Having served on the ICANN Board this is not really an option given that there 
are some materials that cannot be discussed in public (real time).

I believe there is a much easier and transparent solution, require the 
publication of all transcripts and all supporting documentation with 
appropriate redactions by ICANN within 72 hours of the meeting.

We should be asking ourselves the following questions.  There were four board 
meeting held in Costa Rica, why are the transcripts from only one of those 
meetings now available?

Two of the other meetings held discussed conflicts of interests and the 
selection of gTLD providers.  Would anyone that attended the Costa Rica would 
have like to sit in on those meetings as oppose to the joke of a public meeting 
held on Friday?

Best regards,

Michael

P.S. Here are the four Board meetings that were held in Costa Rica:

March 14th 
(http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-2-14mar12-en.htm) 
and (http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-14mar12-en.htm) 
 , one on March 15th 
(http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-15mar12-en.htm) and 
the ten minute joke of a meeting on March 16th 
(http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-16mar12-en.htm).