<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on ICANN's proposed rules for TM Matching
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on ICANN's proposed rules for TM Matching
- From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 01:38:35 +0000
As discussed during yesterday's BC meeting in Toronto, Elisa Cooper has
proposed a comment regarding ICANN's proposed plan for matching rules for names
entered in the Trademark Clearinghouse.
ICANN's Public Comment page for the proposed matching rules is
here<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/tmch-docs-24sep12-en.htm>.
The Matching Rules document we are commenting on is
here<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/matching-rules-24sep12-en.pdf>.
Below is the BC comment proposed by Elisa Cooper:
Subject: Trademark Clearinghouse Matching Rules for “@” and “&”
Upon review of the possible methods for translating “@” and “&” as described in
the “Explanatory Memorandum: Implementing the Matching Rules”, the Business
Constituency requests that the languages for translations of “@” and “&” be
chosen on a per-record basis by the trademark owner.
The memorandum suggests that the language of translations should be based upon
the official language(s) of the trademark registry.
Restricting translations to the official language of the trademark registry is
problematic, particularly for global brands or for trademarks registered in
countries where there is no official language.
Furthermore, requiring that translations of “@” and “&” match the official
language of the trademark registry would likely result in additional costs to
brand owners for additional submissions of the same mark to the Trademark
Clearinghouse.
Initial comments closed 16-Oct. At least one comment
(link<http://forum.icann.org/lists/tmch-docs-sep12/msg00007.html>) refers to
the language restriction, so the BC could file a reply comment by the Reply
closing date of 7-Nov.
That gives us enough time to allow our regular 14-day review and approval
period. So, please reply all with your questions or suggestions regarding this
draft, before 30-Oct-2012.
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
Business Constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|