ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[bc-gnso] report from Toronto session: proposal to consolidate meeting locations

  • To: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [bc-gnso] report from Toronto session: proposal to consolidate meeting locations
  • From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:18:43 +0000

ICANN's Public Comment page for the proposed strategy is 
here<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/meetings-proposal-2012-02oct12-en.htm>.
The "RATIONALE FOR CONSOLIDATED MEETINGS STRATEGY PROPOSAL" is 
here<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/matching-rules-24sep12-en.pdf>.

Summary of the proposal for ICANN meetings in 2014, 2015, and 2016:
Asia/Pacific gets 1st meeting of each year
Europe gets 2nd meeting of each year
North America/Africa/Latin America alternate for the 3rd meeting.

Discussion:

Kieren McCarthy: over half of ICANN participants come from North America.  It's 
more pragmatic to make North America one of the regular annual locations.       
 Chris Disspain asked, and Nick confirmed that North America has the best 
availability of suitable venues.  But Chris argued against using North America 
as a regular annual venue because of ICANN's global outreach priority.

Avri Doria: VISA availability is key.    Nick: If we pick a facility for 
re-use, we do better negotiating visas there.   Avri: “A good reason not to use 
North America is that  North America is not nice about visas”

DelBianco (NetChoice):  The title “Consolidated Meetings” implies fewer ICANN 
meetings.  I don’t see how we can get our work done with just 2 meetings 
instead of 3.   Asked if this 3-year plan is actually a transition plan to cut 
the meetings.
Chris said no.  Nick Tomaso said “Consolidated” was a term with respect to the 
meeting locations.   Chris agreed.

Euralo secretariat said that those who were denied a Canadian Visa will be on a 
list that could deny them future visas. (Is this even remotely true?!)

Hungary GAC rep: the South Africa GAC rep said they were not consulted about 
Durban location selection.   Chris disagreed.

Marguerite (Chilean participant): some countries don’t have venues large enough 
to meet ICANN’s big-meeting requirements.  Asked for flexibility.  Chris said 
it doesn’t work so well if participants have 20-minute bus rides to the 
meetings.

--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy