<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] ICANN Board Considering New UDRP Provider
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] ICANN Board Considering New UDRP Provider
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:37:21 +0000
FYI, on the consent calendar for the 2/28 ICANN Board Meeting
https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/agenda-28feb13-en.htm ---
Arab Center for Dispute Resolution's Proposal to Serve as UDRP Provider
You may recall that the BC is on record as stating several years back (don't
have time right now to find document) that ICANN should not accredit any new
UDRP providers until it developed a standard contract for all providers. My
recollection is that this provider was one of the two being considered at that
time and is based in Amman, Jordan.
In a related matter, while ICANN announced yesterday that NAF would be a URS
provider, it did not state whether NAF would be placed under contract per the
STI recommendation.
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|