<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] ALERTS: New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the Meeting Strategy Working Group: Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
- To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'bc - GNSO list'" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ALERTS: New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the Meeting Strategy Working Group: Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
- From: Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 23:36:50 +0000
Ron,
According to the ICANN website, "Each SO and AC is encouraged to send a list of
volunteers taking into account the need for diversity and not limited to the
number of seats open. This will allow the selectors (the CEO or his designee
and the Chair of the WG) to balance the various factors more easily."
Hope this clarifies a bit.
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
208 389-5779 PH
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron
Andruff
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:22 PM
To: 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ALERTS: New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the
Meeting Strategy Working Group: Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Thank you for reposting this list and information Eliza.
Having attended 40 of ICANN's 45 meetings, I am very interested in this issue.
I am wondering if other BC members share my concern about this statement: As
clearly noted in the ICANN materials, the number of representatives per SO will
be between 1 and 4, with no guarantee of any specific number.? Who is making
the determination and why such a small number of representatives.
In a bottom up consensus driven organization as ICANN, it seems that limiting
such an important group will lessen the number of ideas as well as the depth of
discussion around what future meetings look like. Moreover, an exclusionary
approach will undoubtedly minimize input of the most affected parties -- the
attendees. I think we can all agree that the growth from meetings of 500-600
participants to those of upward of 1500 over the course of this past decade is
something that merits serious discussion. What I don't understand is why and
who is limiting these discussions to such a small group of representatives.
Working Groups are not limited, so why would this group be?
Perhaps the BC could hold some discussions on this topic across the CSG to
maximize feedback to whomever the CSG's participants are?
Thank you to those members who have volunteered. It would be good to have all
of you in those discussions, in my view.
I welcome other member's thoughts on this.
Kind regards,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.<http://www.rnapartners.com>
________________________________
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Elisa Cooper
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 5:56 PM
To: Ron Andruff; 'Benedetta Rossi'; 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ALERTS: New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the
Meeting Strategy Working Group: Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Hi Ron,
Please find attached an e-mail from the Secretariat which lists the names of BC
members who have expressed interest in participating in the Meeting Strategy
Working Group.
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
208 389-5779 PH
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ron Andruff
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 12:27 PM
To: 'Benedetta Rossi'; 'bc - GNSO list'
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] ALERTS: New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the
Meeting Strategy Working Group: Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Dear Benedetta,
Can you advise how much representation we have in this Working Group from the
BC? I am considering it, but don't need to jump in if the BC is already
well-represented.
Thank you,
RA
Ronald N. Andruff
RNA Partners, Inc.<http://www.rnapartners.com>
________________________________
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Benedetta Rossi
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:48 AM
To: bc - GNSO list
Subject: [bc-gnso] ALERTS: New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the Meeting
Strategy Working Group: Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Dear BC Members,
Please find below an ICANN announcement regarding a new deadline for the
submission of application for the Meeting Strategy Working Group, now moved to
Friday, March 8, 2013.
Thank you,
Kind Regards,
Benedetta Rossi
BC Secretariat
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsobc/Home
www.bizconst.org<http://www.bizconst.org>
bc-secretariat@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:bc-secretariat@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-04mar13-en.htm
New Deadline - Call for Applicants for the Meeting Strategy Working Group:
Friday 8 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
4 March 2013
In line with the Board
resolution<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-02feb13-en.htm#2.a>
adopted on February the 2nd 2013, ICANN invited interested individuals to
apply for Volunteer Member positions - either in representation of a Supporting
Organization or Advisory Committee -- to serve on the Meeting Strategy Working
Group.
The mandate and mission of the Meeting Strategy Working Group as defined in the
MSWG Charter<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg/charter>
is as follows: to discuss and propose strategy for the structure, purpose and
locations for ICANN Public Meetings and conferences, starting in 2015.
We thank those applicants who already have submitted applications.
In order to give more time for more members from the wider community to apply,
we are extending the deadline for this call for applicants to Friday 8 March
2013 - 23:59 UTC. Candidatures are to be submitted to
mswgcandidatures@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mswgcandidatures@xxxxxxxxx>
More information
* Call for
Applicants<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg/call-for-volunteers-11feb13-en.htm>
* Charter<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg/charter>
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|