RE: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards

[<icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed.

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

Tel/Fax: +1.415.738.8087

 <http://rodenbaugh.com> http://rodenbaugh.com

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Elisa Cooper
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 11:15 AM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder Consulting; Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards

 

+1

 

Best,

Elisa

 

Elisa Cooper

Director of Product Marketing

MarkMonitor

 

Elisa Cooper

Chair 

ICANN Business Constituency

 

208 389-5779 PH

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Consulting
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 6:48 AM
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards

 

Thanks Steve.

 

I may not be getting the point you are making, but I would feel it
inappropriate for the BC as a group to recommend use of an organisation that
is so closely linked with one specific TLD (Dot XXX).

 

I would prefer a more general comment along the lines of "in general, the BC
is in favor of industry self-regulation and recommends that for the specific
industries outlined in the GAC's advice on safeguards, an appropriate entity
be selected to provide guidance to help each industry sector self regulate."

 

Just very rough wording, but you get the general idea of my comments I'm
sure ;)

 

Thanks,


Stéphane Van Gelder
Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur
STEPHANE VAN GELDER CONSULTING

T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053

T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89

Skype: SVANGELDER
www.StephaneVanGelder.com <http://www.stephanevangelder.com/> 
----------------
Follow us on Twitter: @stephvg and "like" us on Facebook:
www.facebook.com/DomainConsultant <http://www.facebook.com/DomainConsultant>





LinkedIn: fr.linkedin.com/in/domainconsultant/
<http://fr.linkedin.com/in/domainconsultant/> 

 

Le 13 mai 2013 à 14:22, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > a écrit :






For many of the safeguards requested by the GAC, the BC might recommend
industry self-regulation via IFFOR (The International Foundation for Online
Responsibility).  (link <http://iffor.org/safeguard> )

 

See Kieren McCarthy's article on CircleID (link
<http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130510_what_new_gtld_applicants_need_is_a_q
uick_lightweight_answer_to_gac/> )   note: Kieren serves on IFFOR's Policy
Council.

 

Since we are currently drafting BC comments on GAC advice, it would be
helpful to hear BC member feedback on whether we should recommend IFFOR  

 

This may have been what Marilyn and Ron were getting at during the last two
conference calls.

 

-- 

Steve DelBianco

Executive Director

NetChoice

http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org 

+1.202.420.7482