ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards

  • To: mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "'Elisa Cooper'" <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'Stéphane_Van_Gelder_Consulting' <svg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Steve DelBianco'" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards
  • From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:28:59 -0700

I must agree!


Berard



--------- Original Message ---------Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC 
Advice on new gTLD Safeguards
From: icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 5/13/13 11:58 am
To: "'Elisa Cooper'" <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
"'Stéphane_Van_Gelder_Consulting'" <svg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Steve 
DelBianco'" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx

Agreed.
 
Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
Tel/Fax: +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com


 
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Elisa Cooper
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 11:15 AM
To: Stéphane Van Gelder Consulting; Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards



+1
 
Best,
Elisa
 
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
 
Elisa Cooper
Chair 
ICANN Business Constituency
 
208 389-5779 PH

 
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Stéphane Van Gelder Consulting
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 6:48 AM
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] responding to GAC Advice on new gTLD Safeguards



Thanks Steve.


I may not be getting the point you are making, but I would feel it 
inappropriate for the BC as a group to recommend use of an organisation that is 
so closely linked with one specific TLD (Dot XXX).



I would prefer a more general comment along the lines of "in general, the BC is 
in favor of industry self-regulation and recommends that for the specific 
industries outlined in the GAC's advice on safeguards, an appropriate entity be 
selected to provide guidance to help each industry sector self regulate."



Just very rough wording, but you get the general idea of my comments I'm sure ;)



Thanks,


Stéphane Van Gelder
Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur
STEPHANE VAN GELDER CONSULTING

T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053

T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89

Skype: SVANGELDER
www.StephaneVanGelder.com
----------------
Follow us on Twitter: @stephvg and "like" us on Facebook: 
www.facebook.com/DomainConsultant



LinkedIn: fr.linkedin.com/in/domainconsultant/









Le 13 mai 2013 à 14:22, Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :





For many of the safeguards requested by the GAC, the BC might recommend 
industry self-regulation via IFFOR (The International Foundation for Online 
Responsibility).  (link)

 

See Kieren McCarthy's article on CircleID (link)   note: Kieren serves on 
IFFOR's Policy Council.

 

Since we are currently drafting BC comments on GAC advice, it would be helpful 
to hear BC member feedback on whether we should recommend IFFOR  

 

This may have been what Marilyn and Ron were getting at during the last two 
conference calls.

 

-- 

Steve DelBianco

Executive Director

NetChoice

http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org 

+1.202.420.7482


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy