Re: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards for new gTLDs

[Stéphane Van Gelder Consulting <stephvg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for doing that Elisa.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Chairman and Managing Director/Fondateur
STEPHANE VAN GELDER CONSULTING

T (UK): +44 (0)7583 457053
T (FR): +33 (0)6 20 40 55 89
Skype: SVANGELDER
www.StephaneVanGelder.com
----------------
Follow us on Twitter: @stephvg and "like" us on Facebook: 
www.facebook.com/DomainConsultant
LinkedIn: fr.linkedin.com/in/domainconsultant/

Le 20 mai 2013 à 22:00, Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> I’ve also incorporated Stephane’s comments too.
>  
> Please find a revised version attached.
>  
> Best,
> Elisa
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Director of Product Marketing
> MarkMonitor
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Chair
> ICANN Business Constituency
>  
> 208 389-5779 PH
>  
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Elisa Cooper
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Steve DelBianco
> Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on 
> safeguards for new gTLDs
>  
> Steve,
>  
> Thank you so much for all of your work on this.
>  
> Please find attached my edits to Sarah’s draft.
>  
> As previously stated, I will recuse myself from comments related to Closed 
> Generics. That said, I am concerned that the proposed comments in this draft 
> may be at odds with our earlier 
> position:http://www.bizconst.org/Positions-Statements/BC%20Comment%20on%20Closed%20Generic%20TLDs.pdf.
>  
> Thank you again.
>  
> Best,
> Elisa
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Director of Product Marketing
> MarkMonitor
>  
> Elisa Cooper
> Chair
> ICANN Business Constituency
>  
> 208 389-5779 PH
>  
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Deutsch, Sarah B
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 12:29 PM
> To: Steve DelBianco; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on 
> safeguards for new gTLDs
>  
> Steve, All,
> 
> Thanks for your work on this draft. My comments are attached.   One big issue 
> I would flag for members is the paragraph dealing with closed generics.   
> Various BC members have grave concerns about certain closed generics and 
> formal objections have been filed.  The focus on applying for an exemption in 
> the Final Guidebook does not fix these fundamental concerns for the reasons 
> outlined in the attached.
>  
> I’d suggest that the BC either (a) refrain from taking a position on the 
> closed generic issue altogether or (b) support the GAC’s concerns about 
> closed generics and the need to show that an award of an exclusive right in a 
> generic term is in the larger public interest.   
>  
> Sarah
>  
> From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Steve DelBianco
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 4:40 PM
> To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on GAC Advice on safeguards 
> for new gTLDs
>  
> ICANN’s new gTLD Board Committee has requested public comment on how it 
> should address GAC advice to establish safeguards for categories of new 
> gTLDs. (link)
>  
> The BC has have held 3 conference calls on this topic (see minutes and 
> transcripts on the BC Wiki).  Several BC members provided input, including 
> text from Ron Andruff, Marilyn Cade, and Andrew Mack.  
>  
> Comment period closes 4-Jun.   That allows our regular 14-day review and 
> approval period.  So, please REPLY ALL with your suggested edits and comments 
> regarding this draft, before 29-May-2013.
>  
> Steve DelBianco
> Vice chair for policy coordination
> Business Constituency
>  
>  
>  
> <BC Comment on GAC Advice for new gTLDs DRAFT erc svg sd.docx>