ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves

  • To: Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, angie12345@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
  • From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:19:15 -0400

I would like to echo our Chair in appreciation of the work you undertook,  
Angie.  So many if us in the BC are caught up in our daily workload that it is 
hard to find time to participate in the ICANN activities that seem to flow like 
a waterfall these days. But engage we must if the ICANN model is to prevail 
over the ITU and others that would have it another way. So many thanks to you 
for stepping up. 

 Looking forward to seeing you in Durban.

RA

Ron Andruff
www.lifedotsport.com 

-------- Original message --------
From: Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Date: 07/10/2013  15:09  (GMT-05:00) 
To: Angie Graves <angie12345@xxxxxxxxx> 
Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves 
 
Angie,
 
Many, many thanks for this analysis.
 
It is extremely helpful, and your support is appreciated immensely.
 
Best,
Elisa
 
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
 
Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency
 
208 389-5779 PH
 
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:39 AM
To: bc - GNSO list
Cc: Angie Graves
Subject: [bc-gnso] Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
 
Last week, BC member Angie Graves asked me if there were any policy 
coordination projects she could help with.  I suggested 2 documents that would 
help BC members going into the Durban meeting.   Angie came thru with the two 
attachments:
 
1.   Analysis of the public comments on GAC Safeguard Advice.  (first 
attachment)      Here, Angie went thru all 130 of the public comments on GAC 
Safeguard advice, and categorized them (applicant, contract party, registrant, 
user).  This should help us distinguish GAC support/opposition coming from 
"customers" of ICANN versus contract parties and TLD applicants.   Angie 
welcomes further insights on correcting the categorizations.
 
2. Analysis of the BC's RAA requests, versus what the Board approved in the 
final 2013 RAA.   (second attachment)   As we anticipated, few of our requests 
were granted.   
 
Thank you, Angie, for your contributions to the BC's policy work.
--Steve
 
 
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy