<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
- To: Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, angie12345@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
- From: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:19:15 -0400
I would like to echo our Chair in appreciation of the work you undertook,
Angie. So many if us in the BC are caught up in our daily workload that it is
hard to find time to participate in the ICANN activities that seem to flow like
a waterfall these days. But engage we must if the ICANN model is to prevail
over the ITU and others that would have it another way. So many thanks to you
for stepping up.
Looking forward to seeing you in Durban.
RA
Ron Andruff
www.lifedotsport.com
-------- Original message --------
From: Elisa Cooper <Elisa.Cooper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07/10/2013 15:09 (GMT-05:00)
To: Angie Graves <angie12345@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bc - GNSO list <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bc-gnso] RE: Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
Angie,
Many, many thanks for this analysis.
It is extremely helpful, and your support is appreciated immensely.
Best,
Elisa
Elisa Cooper
Director of Product Marketing
MarkMonitor
Elisa Cooper
Chair
ICANN Business Constituency
208 389-5779 PH
From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:39 AM
To: bc - GNSO list
Cc: Angie Graves
Subject: [bc-gnso] Helpful analysis documents by Angie Graves
Last week, BC member Angie Graves asked me if there were any policy
coordination projects she could help with. I suggested 2 documents that would
help BC members going into the Durban meeting. Angie came thru with the two
attachments:
1. Analysis of the public comments on GAC Safeguard Advice. (first
attachment) Here, Angie went thru all 130 of the public comments on GAC
Safeguard advice, and categorized them (applicant, contract party, registrant,
user). This should help us distinguish GAC support/opposition coming from
"customers" of ICANN versus contract parties and TLD applicants. Angie
welcomes further insights on correcting the categorizations.
2. Analysis of the BC's RAA requests, versus what the Board approved in the
final 2013 RAA. (second attachment) As we anticipated, few of our requests
were granted.
Thank you, Angie, for your contributions to the BC's policy work.
--Steve
--
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and http://blog.netchoice.org
+1.202.420.7482
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|