RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP Initial Report

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

RNA supports Marie’s important additions and the rest of the document as is.

 

Thank you,

 

RA

 

Ron Andruff

RNA Partners

 <http://www.rnapartners.com> www.rnapartners.com 

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Marie Pattullo
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:30
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: FW: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP 
Initial Report

 

Thanks to Elisa & Steve; AIM fully supports a move towards thick WHOIS.

 

On page 2, can we please add one bullet:

 

Requiring a ‘thick’ WHOIS would: 

•              improve response consistency,

•              improve stability,

•              improve access to WHOIS data, and

•              provide a more level playing field for competition between 
Registries.

•              enhance consumer/user protection

 

Rationale: we’re supposed to be ensuring that the DN system works for the 
benefit of users – not just registrars/registries. Consumers should have the 
right to know to whom they are giving their data, including credit card details.

 

Many thanks for considering the above,

 

Marie

 

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>  
[mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Laura Covington
Sent: dimanche 28 juillet 2013 18:22
To: Steve DelBianco
Cc: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>  list
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 2-AUG: BC comments on Thick Whois PDP 
Initial Report

 

Looks good to us.  Thanks, Elisa. 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 27, 2013, at 9:43 AM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:

As we've discussed before, there's a PDP (Policy Development Process) underway 
to consider requiring thick Whois for all gTLD registries — including legacy 
TLDs such as com and net.

 

The Working Group published its Initial Report (here 
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/thick-initial-21jun13-en.pdf%20> ), 
concluding there are more benefits than disadvantages to requiring thick Whois 
for all gTLD registries. The Working Group recommends that thick Whois services 
should "become a requirement for all gTLD registries, both existing and future."

 

Public comment page is here 
<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/thick-whois-initial-21jun13-en.htm>
 .

 

Elisa Cooper prepared the attached draft of BC comments.

 

The reply comment period closes 4-Aug-2013, so please Reply All before 2-Aug 
with edits or questions.  

 

And thanks to Elisa for preparing this draft.

 

--

Steve DelBianco 

Vice chair for policy coordination

Business Constituency

 

<BC Comments - Thick Whois PDP WG Initial Report [Draft v1].doc>