<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 11-AUG: BC comments on Expert Working Group for Directory Services ( new Whois)
- To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "stephvg@xxxxxxxxx" <stephvg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 11-AUG: BC comments on Expert Working Group for Directory Services ( new Whois)
- From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:42:46 -0400
ccTLDs often have stronger protections than do the gTLDs. There are a few that
cause concern to global players, but for the most part, and I will ask for
WITSA and AfiCTA and also Zahid to comment, ccTLD managers build infrastructure
and engage locally in ways that gTLDs do not.
It would be a great step forward if the BC could advance a listening and
understanding session for BA during the breakfast.
I will turn to Chris Chaplow, V.Chair of Finance and Operations whom I merely
shadow in terms of expertise, but the ccNSO does the best job of analyzing the
budget, for instance --not merely complaining as is what the Ry and RR do, and
that is informative, but the ccNSO does an actual analysis, which all others
benefit from and I can attest, as CSG participant, that the other sister
constituencies also benefit from this sort of analysis.
Maybe we can look for synergies, and then address differences.
Marilyn Cade, CSG Officer
CC: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx; marie.pattullo@xxxxxx; susank@xxxxxx;
bill.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 11-AUG: BC comments on Expert Working
Group for Directory Services ( new Whois)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 06:32:51 -0700
To: stephvg@xxxxxxxxx
All,I am OK with this and made one change so that there is no mistaking the
ultimate intent.See below:"The BC looks forward to active involvement in this
debate as it goes forward and hopes that the entire community will work towards
one unified model for registration data in all top level domains in the future,
to the benefit of all Internet users and the entire DNS industry.”Cheers,Berard
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2013, at 5:51 AM, stephvg@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
The BC looks forward to active involvement in this debate as it goes forward
and hopes that the entire community will work towards one unified model for all
registration data in the future, to the benefit of all Internet users and the
entire DNS industry.”
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|