ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 11-AUG: BC comments on Expert Working Group for Directory Services ( new Whois)

  • To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "stephvg@xxxxxxxxx" <stephvg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 11-AUG: BC comments on Expert Working Group for Directory Services ( new Whois)
  • From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 09:42:46 -0400

ccTLDs often have stronger protections than do the gTLDs.  There are a few that 
cause concern to global players, but for the most part, and I will ask for 
WITSA and AfiCTA and also Zahid to comment, ccTLD managers build infrastructure 
and engage locally in ways that gTLDs do not.
It would be a great step forward if the BC could advance a listening and 
understanding session for BA during the breakfast. 
I will turn to Chris Chaplow, V.Chair of Finance and Operations whom I merely 
shadow in terms of expertise, but the ccNSO does the best job of analyzing the 
budget, for instance  --not merely complaining as is what the Ry and RR do, and 
that is informative, but the ccNSO does an actual analysis, which all others 
benefit from and I can attest, as CSG participant, that the other sister 
constituencies also benefit from this sort of analysis.
Maybe we can look for synergies, and then address differences. 
Marilyn Cade, CSG Officer

CC: jscottevans@xxxxxxxxx; marie.pattullo@xxxxxx; susank@xxxxxx; 
bill.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW BY 11-AUG: BC comments on Expert Working 
Group for Directory Services ( new Whois)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 06:32:51 -0700
To: stephvg@xxxxxxxxx

All,I am OK with this and made one change so that there is no mistaking the 
ultimate intent.See below:"The BC looks forward to active involvement in this 
debate as it goes forward and hopes that the entire community will work towards 
one unified model for registration data in all top level domains in the future, 
to the benefit of all Internet users and the entire DNS industry.”Cheers,Berard

Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2013, at 5:51 AM, stephvg@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

The BC looks forward to active involvement in this debate as it goes forward 
and hopes that the entire community will work towards one unified model for all 
registration data in the future, to the benefit of all Internet users and the 
entire DNS industry.”                                          


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy