RE: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve, Anjali, Gabi and colleagues, 

 

The draft BC comment is quite good in recommending a number of means by
which PICS enforcement can be strengthened.  Considering that the March
PICDRP was edited down from 8 pages to 4 in this October version, it is
going in the right direction in my view.

 

I support this good work.

 

Thanks and kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ron Andruff

RNA Partners

 <http://www.rnapartners.com> www.rnapartners.com 

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Steve DelBianco
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 21:29
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Hansen, Anjali; Gabriela Szlak
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest
Commitments dispute resolution

 

During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this
public comment:

 

Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution
<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-picdrp-02oct13-en.htm>
procedure (PICDRP).      The BC advocated for public interest commitments
(beyond what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the
DRP.  Need a volunteer.

 

We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the
challenge.   

 

Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review and
comment.   Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions.    We will
finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline of 23-Oct.

 

Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead.

 

--Steve