ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[bc-gnso]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution

  • To: Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution
  • From: Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 20:19:15 -0200

Thanks so much for your feedback Ron!
Much appreciated.
Gabi

*Gabriela Szlak *

*
*

*Skype:* gabrielaszlak

*Twitter: @*GabiSzlak


La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial.
The information in this e-mail is confidential.



2013/10/22 Ron Andruff <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Steve, Anjali, Gabi and colleagues, ****
>
> ** **
>
> The draft BC comment is quite good in recommending a number of means by
> which PICS enforcement can be strengthened.  Considering that the March
> PICDRP was edited down from 8 pages to 4 in this October version, it is
> going in the right direction in my view.****
>
> ** **
>
> I support this good work.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks and kind regards,****
>
> ** **
>
> RA****
>
> ** **
>
> *Ron Andruff*
>
> *RNA Partners*
>
> *www.rnapartners.com* <http://www.rnapartners.com>* *
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve DelBianco
> *Sent:* Friday, October 11, 2013 21:29
> *To:* bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
> *Cc:* Hansen, Anjali; Gabriela Szlak
> *Subject:* [bc-gnso] FOR REVIEW: draft BC comment on Public Interest
> Commitments dispute resolution****
>
> ** **
>
> During last week's BC member call, we called for volunteers to draft this
> public comment:****
>
> ** **
>
> Revised Public Interest Commitments dispute resolution 
> procedure<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-picdrp-02oct13-en.htm>
>  (PICDRP).      The BC advocated for public interest commitments (beyond
> what's in the TLD application) and should attempt to comment on the DRP.
>  Need a volunteer…****
>
> ** **
>
> We're very fortunate that Gabi Szlak and Anjali Hansen stepped-up to the
> challenge.   ****
>
> ** **
>
> Gabi and Anjali's draft is attached, giving BC members 12 days to review
> and comment.   Please REPLY ALL with any questions or suggestions.    We
> will finalize on 22-Oct and submit by the initial comment deadline
> of 23-Oct.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks again to Gabi and Anjali for taking the lead.****
>
> ** **
>
> --Steve****
>
>  ****
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy