RE: [bc-gnso] FOR MONDAY DISCUSSION: BC Comment on ATRT2 - Accountability & Transparency Team's Draft Review

[Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Comments on the doc regarding resolutions. I didn't see an attachment about 
meetings.
I am not so strongly positive about the use of the public comments as the 
original statement, and tried to temper it a bit.  
Should we add in a statement about respecting the meetings period? It might be 
an easy add.
M
From: sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bc-gnso] FOR MONDAY DISCUSSION: BC Comment on ATRT2 - Accountability 
& Transparency Team's Draft Review
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:57:59 +0000








For the BC meeting today in Buenos Aires (noon in Retiro B), please try to 
review the ATRT2. 










The second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT2) was convened as 
part of the Affirmation of Commitments.  (ATRT2 page) 



The ATRT2 has published its draft review/recommendations (here), including 
these recommendation:


• establish clear metrics and benchmarks against which improvements in 
accountability and transparency can be measured;
• communicate clearly and consistently about its accountability and 
transparency mechanisms and performance; and
• improve and prioritize its AoC Review processes.





Initial comments are due 22-Nov and reply comments close 13-Dec



The BC offered several suggestions to the ATRT2 when they began in Jun-2013  
(link)



Anjali Hansen, Elisa Cooper, and Angie Graves volunteered to cover parts of the 
document for the BC.  Elisa drafted comments on meetings (first attachment) and 
Angie on multi-lingual resources. 














-- 
Steve DelBianco
Executive Director
NetChoice
http://www.NetChoice.org and 
http://blog.netchoice.org 
+1.202.420.7482