<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[bc-gnso] FILED: BC Comments on Study of Whois Privacy/Proxy Abuse
- To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx" <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [bc-gnso] FILED: BC Comments on Study of Whois Privacy/Proxy Abuse
- From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:19:14 +0000
As confirmed at the BC meeting in Buenos Aires last week, we filed comments on
ICANN’s latest study of Whois Privacy/Proxy abuse.
See
link<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-whois-pp-abuse-study-24sep13/msg00013.html>
and below.
Thanks to Elisa Cooper and Susan Kawaguchi for drafting.
--
The Business Constituency (BC) supports the conclusions of the study as being
consistent with our long-held belief that a significant portion of bad actors
are using privacy and proxy services to facilitate abuse that harms business
and consumer interests.
The BC encourages the ICANN community to move forward with accreditation of
privacy and proxy services in order to help the business community address
abuse through increased access to accurate registrant information.
The study examined and supported the hypothesis that “a significant percentage
of the domain names used to conduct illegal or harmful Internet activities are
registered via privacy and proxy services to obscure the perpetrator’s
identity.” It provides important information for the ICANN community, as Whois
accuracy and completeness is a primary goal at this time. The conclusions
clearly demonstrate that an overhaul of the system is not only warranted, but
necessary.
The BC recognizes that there are legitimate uses for privacy and proxy
services, such as shielding the identity of those engaged in non-commercial
free speech, or the launch of a new product and/or service in the business
community. However, the information contained in the study, which illustrates
widespread abuse detrimental to consumers and businesses alike, clearly
demonstrates the need to proactively restrict the use of privacy and proxy
services to organizations and individuals that are using them for legitimate
purposes.
The BC also recognizes that stopping privacy and proxy service abuse is not the
only way to stop abusive behavior online. When domain names are registered with
the intent of conducting illegal or harmful Internet activities, a range of
different methods are used to avoid providing viable contact information.
The BC looks forward to addressing all of these issues in the community-led
development stage of the Aggregated Registration Directory Service. In the
meantime, the BC encourages the ICANN to give attention to the issues that can
be addressed immediately.
We note that although this study covered 5 TLDs, .com names dominated the
datasets — only 10% were from the other 4 gTLDs. Given that, one possible
approach may be for the .com registry to implement privacy and proxy services
guidelines as an interim measure. This could be much faster than having ICANN
make rules for all gTLDs. We would still want the proxy/privacy vendors
accredited, but there may be an interim solution with the registry itself.
The BC looks forward to participating in the GNSO RAA Remaining Issues Policy
Development Process on Privacy and Proxy Services, to develop an accreditation
system which restricts the shielding of registrant data to legitimate,
non-commercial, non-abusive websites.
The BC thanks ICANN and the NPL for this comprehensive study.
These comments were drafted by Elisa Cooper and Susan Kawaguchi, and were
approved in accord with our charter.
--
Steve DelBianco
Vice chair for policy coordination
ICANN Business Constituency
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|