RE: [bc-gnso] FW: GoDaddy.com Loses Motion to Recuse 'The Academy's Judge'

["Ron Andruff" <randruff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear John and all,

 

Your comment (“…This may wind up being the real shortcoming in the 
communications surrounding the new gTLD program.”) is well taken.  With some 
100 new gTLDs already added to the root at this point, I find it somewhat 
astounding that there is so little pick up by the broader media; which is a 
direct reflection on the lack of marketing activities by new gTLD Registries.  
Rightly or wrongly, I had expected that the ‘cacophony of marketing noise’ 
derived from the aggregate of new gTLD operators would ultimately awaken 
consumer interest in this program, but personally I haven’t seen any marketing 
whatsoever…

 

Perhaps it is a .COM  world after all, and all of this effort has been for 
naught.

 

My two cents…

 

Kind regards,

 

RA

 

Ron Andruff

RNA Partners

 <http://www.rnapartners.com> www.rnapartners.com 

 

From: owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Phil Corwin
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 15:02
To: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] FW: GoDaddy.com Loses Motion to Recuse 'The Academy's 
Judge'

 

John:

 

A few comments—

*         The article is from the National Law Journal, not National Journal, 
and was triggered by GoDaddy’s failure to remove the trial judge for alleged 
bias

*         The case has nothing to do with new gTLDs; as the story notes, the 
litigation was filed in 2010 (which says a lot about the efficiency of the 
Federal civil trial system)

 

I have not made sufficient inquiry into the facts of the case or the underlying 
law to form any opinion on its merits. And, like many lawsuits, it could settle 
before a verdict is rendered.

 

That said, a finding that the world’s leading registrar had committed trademark 
infringement in its domain parking activities would have very broad legal and 
industry repercussions, which is the reason I brought it to the attention of BC 
members.

 

As for communications efforts surrounding new gTLDs, I would agree that there 
are substantial shortcomings in current efforts, including ICANN’s own.

 

Best regards, Philip

 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/cell

 

Twitter: @VlawDC

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
[mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:07 PM
To: Phil Corwin; bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> 
Subject: RE: [bc-gnso] FW: GoDaddy.com Loses Motion to Recuse 'The Academy's 
Judge'

 

This email prompts a thought.

 

As domain names continue to push their way closer to mass market awareness, 
stories like this one in the National Journal which bears an incredulous tone, 
are only going to become more prevalent, cynical and one-sided.  Particularly 
as the ripples of the new gTLD program reaches media who know less and less and 
less about ICANN, UDRP practices or any of the mechanics that make-up domain 
name registration policies.

 

To the naked eye, it likely seems that the Academy should prevail in the case 
against oscarlist.com or academyawardsinc.com; so much so that if GoDaddy were 
to win the case, it might seem like a miscarriage of justice.  Now that would 
be a problem beyond this one case.

 

The problem is rooted in the fact that there is too little grounding in domain 
names beyond the small group of people who have participated in ICANN, yet 
public policy, law and public opinion is made by more who don't.  This may wind 
up being the real shortcoming in the communications surrounding the new gTLD 
program.

 

Cheers,

 

John Berard

 

--------- Original Message ---------

Subject: [bc-gnso] FW: GoDaddy.com Loses Motion to Recuse 'The Academy's Judge'
From: "Phil Corwin" <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx> >
Date: 2/11/14 9:35 am
To: "bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> " <bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:bc-gnso@xxxxxxxxx> >

FYI—very high profile cybersquatting case against Go Daddy… 

Subject: GoDaddy.com Loses Motion to Recuse 'The Academy's Judge' 

http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202641536588?kw=GoDaddy.com%20Loses%20Motion%20to%20Recuse%20%27The%20Academy%27s%20Judge%27
 
<http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202641536588?kw=GoDaddy.com%20Loses%20Motion%20to%20Recuse%20%27The%20Academy%27s%20Judge%27&et=editorial&bu=National%20Law%20Journal&cn=20140211&src=EMC-Email&pt=Daily%20Headlines>
 
&et=editorial&bu=National%20Law%20Journal&cn=20140211&src=EMC-Email&pt=Daily%20Headlines
 

GoDaddy.com Loses Motion to Recuse 'The Academy's Judge' 

Amanda Bronstad, The National Law Journal

February 04, 2014, 05:03 PM    | 

1988 Academy Awards red carpet Photo: Alan Light via Wikimedia Commons 

Domain-name registrar GoDaddy.com Inc. has lost an effort to force the recusal 
of a federal judge based on alleged bias toward the Academy of Motion Picture 
Arts and Sciences, whose own attorney it said referred to her as “the Academy’s 
judge.”

In 2010, the Academy, which hosts the Oscars awards show, sued GoDaddy.com for 
cybersquatting. The suit alleges that GoDaddy.com offers a program by which its 
customers can “park” a Web page—in this case, allegedly under infringing domain 
names—for the sole purpose of collecting ad revenue derived when users click 
onto the sites.

Among the more than 100 domain names at issue are oscarlist.com and 
academyawardsinc.com. The case is scheduled to go to trial later this year.

Although the case originally was assigned to U.S. District Judge Dale Fischer 
in Los Angeles, the Academy successfully moved to transfer the litigation to 
U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins, who is overseeing related cases over its 
trademarks.

During a hearing Monday, Fischer rejected GoDaddy’s motion to recuse Collins, 
saying she would issue a written ruling soon. “The Court finds that the motion 
is untimely, frivolous, and that defense has provided no evidence that a 
reasonable person could conclude that there is any bias by Judge Collins,” 
Fischer concluded, according to a minute order of the proceedings.

“Her ruling began by characterizing the motion as both untimely and frivolous 
and concluded by noting that GoDaddy had blatantly misrepresented the facts,” 
said David Quinto, a partner at Los Angeles-based Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & 
Sullivan and the Academy’s longtime trademark attorney.

The organization’s counsel of record, Stuart Singer, a partner in Boies, 
Schiller & Flexner's Fort Lauderdale office, said he was “gratified by Judge 
Fischer’s decision.”

GoDaddy.com did not respond to a request for comment, and its attorney, Aaron 
McKown of Wrenn Bender in Irvine, Calif., did not return a call for comment.

Among other things, GoDaddy.com’s attorneys claimed in a Dec. 31 motion that 
the Academy has attempted “to game the system” by steering all its cases before 
Collins, who has overseen 25 of its disputes within the past 15 years. In this 
case, they noted that Collins had ruled for the Academy on a number of motions, 
including for dismissal and summary judgment. Collins has allegedly encouraged 
GoDaddy.com to settle the case while suggesting the Academy file a second suit.

The Academy, in turn, has used its leverage with Collins, whose daughter is an 
actress, in settlement negotiations, the motion asserts. During a 2012 meeting 
on potential settlement terms, for example, Quinto allegedly told GoDaddy.com’s 
attorneys that they should know Collins is “the Academy’s judge.”

In court papers, the Academy’s attorneys called GoDaddy.com’s claims 
“outrageous and sanctionable.” In a Jan. 13 opposition filing, they noted that 
GoDaddy.com did not object at the time the case was transferred. They brushed 
aside arguments about Collins’ daughter, who is not an Academy member, and 
called accusations about the judge’s statements misleading. They also defended 
their own settlement discussions.

Quinto said his reference to Collins as “the Academy judge”—not, he insisted, 
“the Academy’s judge” as GoDaddy.com contends—simply meant she “was familiar 
with the academy’s intellectual properties.”

“GoDaddy’s motion struck me as baseless and Judge Collins is a very well 
respected judge,” he added. “Let’s just say that in my career, I’ve never seen 
something like this.”

Contact Amanda Bronstad at abronstad@xxxxxxx <mailto:abronstad@xxxxxxx> .



Read more:  
<http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202641536588/GoDaddy.com-Loses-Motion-to-Recuse-%27The-Academy%27s-Judge%27#ixzz2t2FOD93o>
 
http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202641536588/GoDaddy.com-Loses-Motion-to-Recuse-%27The-Academy%27s-Judge%27#ixzz2t2FOD93o

 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/cell

 

Twitter: @VlawDC

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> 
Version: 2013.0.3462 / Virus Database: 3697/7069 - Release Date: 02/06/14

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> 
Version: 2013.0.3462 / Virus Database: 3697/7069 - Release Date: 02/06/14