Selective Censorship by ICANN ALAC part 3 To:Re: Request to mailing list ALAC rejected

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Whomever this is and all,

  Yet again and today for the third time, what does 
>"No reason given" mean?  Seems rather nebulous and
inconsistant with rationality.  Or is this yet another
example of Selective Censorship without reason?  

-----Original Message-----
>From: alac-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Apr 16, 2008 5:14 AM
>To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Request to mailing list ALAC rejected
>
>Your request to the ALAC mailing list
>
>    Posting of your message titled "RE: [At-Large] ALAC Draft
>Accountability Framework and Conflicts of
>       Interest Policy"
>
>has been rejected by the list moderator.  The moderator gave the
>following reason for rejecting your request:
>
>"No reason given"
>
>Any questions or comments should be directed to the list administrator
>at:
>
>    alac-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827