Re: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs

["Bertrand de La Chapelle" <bdelachapelle@xxxxxxxxx>]

The issue we need to address is : "how to handle comments". The expression
"objection procedure" is too strict/strong and calls for a sort of right of
veto. I believe that comments should be handled at the lowest possible
levels, and in particular first within the script community concerned before
it goes upwards to the board.

We need a flexible set of mechanisms. Any concentrated and not distributed
process will in the end put all the load on the Board, which is not sound.

Best

Bertrand


On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Hi Chris,
>
>
>
> Based on the discussion on the last few conference calls about Principle E
> and that of objection (or I think a better way to describe it may be a
> process to facilitate comments), I do not feel that what is drafted
> currently could be described as a consensus.
>
>
>
> At least in the call yesterday, out of about 6-7 active speakers, at least
> 3-4 brought out disagreements on the points.  This is consistent with the
> previous few conference calls.
>
>
>
> Therefore, rather than having reached consensus, I think it maybe better
> characterized as having more than one alternative views about the issue.
>
>
>
> Edmon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Chris Disspain
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:06 AM
> *To:* ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> Following the teleconference, for clarity, this is what we agreed:
>
>
>
> a) Bart and I will work on a 'final' version of the methodology report
>
> b) In respect to Principle E and the possibility of an objection process,
> the report will reflect the consensus as we understand it. However, at least
> 2 members of the WG feel that Principle E should be amended and that there
> should be an objection process. Those who feel that way may, if they wish,
> provide text setting out their position and this will be included in the
> report.
>
> c)  We agreed that the LEAP text will be included for now.
>
> d) We agreed that when the WG publishes the report (on or around 10 June)
> it will state that we are still discussing some aspects, that we will be
> meeting face to face on 21 June and we may make amendments.
>
>
>
> If I have missed anything please let me know.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Chris Disspain
>
> CEO - auDA
>
> Australia's Domain Name Administrator
>
> ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> www.auda.org.au
>
>
>
> *Important Notice - *This email may contain information which is
> confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the use
> of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you must
> not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have received this
> email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this message
> immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of Foreign
and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")