RE: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs

["Chris Disspain" <ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Bertrand.

?.which is why I have asked those who do not agree with Principle E and
and who believe there should be an objection procedure to draft words to
go into the report.

Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
Australia's Domain Name Administrator
ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.auda.org.au

Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the
use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have
received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.

  _____

From: owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bertrand de La
Chapelle
Sent: Thursday, 29 May 2008 18:56
To: Edmon Chung
Cc: ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs

The issue we need to address is : "how to handle comments". The expression
"objection procedure" is too strict/strong and calls for a sort of right
of veto. I believe that comments should be handled at the lowest possible
levels, and in particular first within the script community concerned
before it goes upwards to the board.

We need a flexible set of mechanisms. Any concentrated and not distributed
process will in the end put all the load on the Board, which is not sound.


Best

Bertrand


On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Chris,

Based on the discussion on the last few conference calls about Principle E
and that of objection (or I think a better way to describe it may be a
process to facilitate comments), I do not feel that what is drafted
currently could be described as a consensus.

At least in the call yesterday, out of about 6-7 active speakers, at least
3-4 brought out disagreements on the points.  This is consistent with the
previous few conference calls.

Therefore, rather than having reached consensus, I think it maybe better
characterized as having more than one alternative views about the issue.

Edmon



From: owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Disspain
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 7:06 AM
To: ccnso-idncctld@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ccnso-idncctld] IDNs

All,

Following the teleconference, for clarity, this is what we agreed:

a) Bart and I will work on a 'final' version of the methodology report
b) In respect to Principle E and the possibility of an objection process,
the report will reflect the consensus as we understand it. However, at
least 2 members of the WG feel that Principle E should be amended and that
there should be an objection process. Those who feel that way may, if they
wish, provide text setting out their position and this will be included in
the report.
c)  We agreed that the LEAP text will be included for now.
d) We agreed that when the WG publishes the report (on or around 10 June)
it will state that we are still discussing some aspects, that we will be
meeting face to face on 21 June and we may make amendments.

If I have missed anything please let me know.

Cheers,

Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
Australia's Domain Name Administrator
ceo@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.auda.org.au

Important Notice - This email may contain information which is
confidential and/or subject to legal privilege, and is intended for the
use of the named addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient,
you must not use, disclose or copy any part of this email. If you have
received this email by mistake, please notify the sender and delete this
message immediately. Please consider the environment before printing this
email.





--
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
Information Society
Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of
Foreign and European Affairs
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")