<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
“closed generic” domains should not be permitted.
- To: comments-closed-generic-05feb13@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: “closed generic” domains should not be permitted.
- From: Brian Aamodt <baamodt1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 09:02:55 -0600
- We support an Internet that is open and focused and has room for the
security and alarm industry.
- Generic words cannot and should not be owned for the exclusive use of
one company.
- A closed generic domain is not in the public interest.
- If ICANN permits any company to possess a “closed domain” – including
Symantec (a computer company) to use “.security” then the security and
alarm industry could be lost.
- Closed use of “.security” is not similar to the way “.com,” “.net” and
“.org” are used on the Internet daily.
- Therefore, we believe a closed generic application for “.security” is
anticompetitive and we request that ICANN require applicants for closed
generic TLDs to either open the TLD or withdraw for a full refund.
Brian Aamodt
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|