ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

ICANN = Under US Control, until legacy problem(s) solved.

  • To: comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: ICANN = Under US Control, until legacy problem(s) solved.
  • From: Graham Schreiber <graham_schreiber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:00:27 -0500

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: 
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hi&nbsp;CWG: &nbsp; &nbsp; 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Bcc Penny Pritzker &amp; Robert 
Flaim.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>While the NTIA is under an 
impending &nbsp;<b>United States Supreme Court, Rule 20</b>&nbsp; filing, 
questioning their negligent conduct, as being <b>"causation" </b>of harms to 
Enterprise; and the clients of Enterprise being <b>"The Consumer" </b>the 
United States Government should follow this linked contract &nbsp;&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 8px; ">&gt;&gt; &nbsp;<a 
href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sf_26_pg_1-2-final_award_and_sacs.pdf";>http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sf_26_pg_1-2-final_award_and_sacs.pdf</a>
 &lt;&lt;</span>&nbsp; &nbsp;exercising both<b> Option's &nbsp;2 &amp; 
3</b>.</div><div><br></div><div>The NTIA are contractually subject's to the 
Commercial Regulations published by the Federal Trade Commission; and also the 
Antitrust Laws of the United States, as confirmed in Docket Number: 
980212036-8146-02 as / linking to the FTC:</div><div><br></div><div><div><div 
style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Statutes Enforced or Administered by the 
Commission</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; 
"><b><i><br></i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>The Commission 
has enforcement or administrative responsibilities under more than 70 laws. 
They are grouped here in three categories:&nbsp;</i></b></div><div 
style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(a) Statutes relating to both the competition 
and consumer protection missions;&nbsp;</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 
11px; "><b><i>(b) statutes relating principally to the competition mission; 
and&nbsp;</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(c) statutes 
relating principally to the consumer protection mission.</i></b></div><div 
style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i><br></i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; 
"><b><i>The Federal Trade Commission Act is the primary statute of the 
Commission. Under this Act, the Commission is empowered, among other things, 
to</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(a) prevent unfair methods 
of competition, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting 
commerce;&nbsp;</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(b) seek 
monetary redress and other relief for conduct injurious to 
consumers;&nbsp;</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(c) 
prescribe trade regulation rules defining with specificity acts or practices 
that are unfair or deceptive, and establishing requirements designed to prevent 
such acts or practices;&nbsp;</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; 
"><b><i>(d) conduct investigations relating to the organization, business, 
practices, and management of entities engaged in commerce; 
and&nbsp;</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(e) make reports 
and legislative recommendations to Congress.</i></b></div><div 
style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i><br></i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; 
"><b><i>Federal Trade Commission Act</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; 
"><b><i>Mission: Competition Consumer Protection</i></b></div><div 
style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Rule/Law: 15 U.S.C. §§ 41-58, as 
amended</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Link: <a 
href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/41";>http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/41</a></i></b></div></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>By
 way of&nbsp;UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, &nbsp;Docket Number: 
980212036-8146-02 &nbsp;for the&nbsp;Management of Internet Names and Addresses 
by the&nbsp;AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration&nbsp;ACTION: Statement of Policy: &nbsp; &nbsp;Enter's ... 
&nbsp; WIPO &nbsp;and &nbsp;Dr. Francis Gurry, who also is being investigated 
in the same Lawsuit.</div><div><br></div><div>The United Nations Association, a 
New York States Corporation, with chosen Jurisdictional Venue, in the District 
of Columbia, have a Chartered Organization as the <b>World Intellectual 
Property Organization (WIPO) </b>&nbsp;have,&nbsp;under the <b>"Leadership"</b> 
of Dr. Francis Gurry, &nbsp; [ See: <span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="font-size: 8px; "><b><a 
href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/1998/testimony-j-beckwith-burr";>http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/1998/testimony-j-beckwith-burr</a></b></span>&nbsp;]
 &nbsp; &nbsp;let a Domain Name Registrant &nbsp;<b>EVADE US 
Law's.</b></div><div><br></div><div>The support furnished from Dr. Gurry, has 
allowed CentralNic an exclusive benefit &nbsp;[ Disparate Treatment ] &nbsp;to 
Mediate between their own Clients, the &nbsp;"Induced" &nbsp;"Infringers" 
&nbsp;and the genuinely "Diluted" and "Infringed" Domain Name Registrants, 
which beyond being a violation of ICANN's own <b>&gt; NON ENFORCED, RAA 3.7.7.9 
&lt; </b>&nbsp;have helped CentralNic to violate&nbsp;15 U.S. Code § 1125 - 
False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution 
forbidden.</div><div><br></div><div><div>These allowances by ICANN and the NTIA 
have also resulted in &nbsp;CentralNic's &nbsp;violation of yet another United 
States Law:&nbsp;&nbsp;18 U.S. Code § 2320 - Trafficking in counterfeit goods 
or services &nbsp;and this has been a supported activity of both Network 
Solutions &amp; VeriSign, allowing CentralNic to 
&nbsp;<b>"CONTRIBUTE"</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;it's own coded links ... above their 
retail clients, connecting the&nbsp;<b>"Spurious Marks / False Designation TLDs 
or ccTLDs"&nbsp;</b>&nbsp;with the compromised Trademark 
Name**.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div>I'm very concerned 
that ICANN are so engrossed in seeing their Registry &amp; registry Operators 
also known as, Registrar &amp; registrar Operators<b>&nbsp; [emphasis added to 
Capital "R" and Lowercase "r"]</b> &nbsp; as the Pre-eminent 
&nbsp;<b>"Customer"</b>&nbsp; being a serious detriment to all Domain Name 
Registrants. &nbsp;[ See: <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 8px; 
"><b>Part 3: &nbsp;Customer Standing Committee (CSC) – While the exact 
composition is still to be determined, the CSC would primarily be made up of a 
number of representatives of registry operators, including ccTLD and gTLD 
registries.&nbsp;</b></span>]</div><div><br></div><div>Because ICANN, NTIA, 
VeriSign &amp; Network Solutions are also parties to this same Lawsuit, for 
failing to enforce their own aspects of the RAA 3.7.7.9; and other Laws, it's 
my opinion that they've fawned all over them &nbsp;"The Customer" &nbsp; since; 
and prior to the MoU, when Network Solutions held sway; and must all be held 
accountable.</div><div><br></div><div>As such the conduct of ICANN / IANA &amp; 
NTIA, along with their &nbsp;"Customers" &nbsp;must be Judicially reviewed; and 
the RAA Rules related to "R" or "r" registries &amp; registrars per the RAA's, 
&nbsp;Section 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS, &nbsp;must be enforced, as 
<b>"judged by a court of competent jurisdiction"</b> which for the parties, is 
excessively &nbsp;the United States Supreme Court, under a Rule 20, &nbsp;prior 
to the United States Government releasing 
control.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div>Both ICANN and 
the NTIA have&nbsp;<b>"KNOWN"</b>&nbsp;of this, as Host &amp; Sponsors of the 
".com" Instrumentality used to Infringe, therefore, until legacy issues are 
Lawfully resolved, ICANN &amp; IANA must continue to have the "oversight" of 
the United States 
Government.</div></div></div><div><br></div><div><div><div><br></div></div></div><div>Thank
 you for&nbsp;publicly&nbsp;asking for opinions, it's much appreciated; and I 
look forward to seeing an "accountable" and Law abiding future for ICANN &amp; 
IANA.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Graham
 Schreiber, of "Civil Society".</div><div>Pro 
Se.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size: 11px; 
"><b><i>**(d) Cyberpiracy prevention = Domain Name, Mark, Trademark, as in a 
business Trade Name / Source Identifying Mark, without an explicit&nbsp;<span 
class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(84, 84, 84); font-family: arial, 
sans-serif; line-height: 16px; font-size: 12px; ">® designation 
required.</span></i></b></div></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" 
color="#545454" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="line-height: 16px;"><b><i></i></b></span></font></div></body></html>

Attachment: Rule 20 = Exceptional and Extraordinary Circumstances..pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: 
space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><font 
class="Apple-style-span" color="#545454" face="arial, sans-serif"><span 
class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 
16px;"><b><i></i></b></span></font></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>