ICANN = Under US Control, until legacy problem(s) solved.
<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hi CWG: Bcc Penny Pritzker & Robert Flaim. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>While the NTIA is under an impending <b>United States Supreme Court, Rule 20</b> filing, questioning their negligent conduct, as being <b>"causation" </b>of harms to Enterprise; and the clients of Enterprise being <b>"The Consumer" </b>the United States Government should follow this linked contract <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 8px; ">>> <a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sf_26_pg_1-2-final_award_and_sacs.pdf">http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/sf_26_pg_1-2-final_award_and_sacs.pdf</a> <<</span> exercising both<b> Option's 2 & 3</b>.</div><div><br></div><div>The NTIA are contractually subject's to the Commercial Regulations published by the Federal Trade Commission; and also the Antitrust Laws of the United States, as confirmed in Docket Number: 980212036-8146-02 as / linking to the FTC:</div><div><br></div><div><div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Statutes Enforced or Administered by the Commission</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i><br></i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>The Commission has enforcement or administrative responsibilities under more than 70 laws. They are grouped here in three categories: </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(a) Statutes relating to both the competition and consumer protection missions; </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(b) statutes relating principally to the competition mission; and </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(c) statutes relating principally to the consumer protection mission.</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i><br></i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>The Federal Trade Commission Act is the primary statute of the Commission. Under this Act, the Commission is empowered, among other things, to</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(a) prevent unfair methods of competition, and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce; </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(b) seek monetary redress and other relief for conduct injurious to consumers; </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(c) prescribe trade regulation rules defining with specificity acts or practices that are unfair or deceptive, and establishing requirements designed to prevent such acts or practices; </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(d) conduct investigations relating to the organization, business, practices, and management of entities engaged in commerce; and </i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>(e) make reports and legislative recommendations to Congress.</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i><br></i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Federal Trade Commission Act</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Mission: Competition Consumer Protection</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Rule/Law: 15 U.S.C. §§ 41-58, as amended</i></b></div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>Link: <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/41">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/41</a></i></b></div></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>By way of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Docket Number: 980212036-8146-02 for the Management of Internet Names and Addresses by the AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration ACTION: Statement of Policy: Enter's ... WIPO and Dr. Francis Gurry, who also is being investigated in the same Lawsuit.</div><div><br></div><div>The United Nations Association, a New York States Corporation, with chosen Jurisdictional Venue, in the District of Columbia, have a Chartered Organization as the <b>World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) </b> have, under the <b>"Leadership"</b> of Dr. Francis Gurry, [ See: <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 8px; "><b><a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/1998/testimony-j-beckwith-burr">http://www.ntia.doc.gov/speechtestimony/1998/testimony-j-beckwith-burr</a></b></span> ] let a Domain Name Registrant <b>EVADE US Law's.</b></div><div><br></div><div>The support furnished from Dr. Gurry, has allowed CentralNic an exclusive benefit [ Disparate Treatment ] to Mediate between their own Clients, the "Induced" "Infringers" and the genuinely "Diluted" and "Infringed" Domain Name Registrants, which beyond being a violation of ICANN's own <b>> NON ENFORCED, RAA 3.7.7.9 < </b> have helped CentralNic to violate 15 U.S. Code § 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden.</div><div><br></div><div><div>These allowances by ICANN and the NTIA have also resulted in CentralNic's violation of yet another United States Law: 18 U.S. Code § 2320 - Trafficking in counterfeit goods or services and this has been a supported activity of both Network Solutions & VeriSign, allowing CentralNic to <b>"CONTRIBUTE"</b> it's own coded links ... above their retail clients, connecting the <b>"Spurious Marks / False Designation TLDs or ccTLDs" </b> with the compromised Trademark Name**.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div>I'm very concerned that ICANN are so engrossed in seeing their Registry & registry Operators also known as, Registrar & registrar Operators<b> [emphasis added to Capital "R" and Lowercase "r"]</b> as the Pre-eminent <b>"Customer"</b> being a serious detriment to all Domain Name Registrants. [ See: <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 8px; "><b>Part 3: Customer Standing Committee (CSC) – While the exact composition is still to be determined, the CSC would primarily be made up of a number of representatives of registry operators, including ccTLD and gTLD registries. </b></span>]</div><div><br></div><div>Because ICANN, NTIA, VeriSign & Network Solutions are also parties to this same Lawsuit, for failing to enforce their own aspects of the RAA 3.7.7.9; and other Laws, it's my opinion that they've fawned all over them "The Customer" since; and prior to the MoU, when Network Solutions held sway; and must all be held accountable.</div><div><br></div><div>As such the conduct of ICANN / IANA & NTIA, along with their "Customers" must be Judicially reviewed; and the RAA Rules related to "R" or "r" registries & registrars per the RAA's, Section 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS, must be enforced, as <b>"judged by a court of competent jurisdiction"</b> which for the parties, is excessively the United States Supreme Court, under a Rule 20, prior to the United States Government releasing control.</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div><div>Both ICANN and the NTIA have <b>"KNOWN"</b> of this, as Host & Sponsors of the ".com" Instrumentality used to Infringe, therefore, until legacy issues are Lawfully resolved, ICANN & IANA must continue to have the "oversight" of the United States Government.</div></div></div><div><br></div><div><div><div><br></div></div></div><div>Thank you for publicly asking for opinions, it's much appreciated; and I look forward to seeing an "accountable" and Law abiding future for ICANN & IANA.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Sincerely,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Graham Schreiber, of "Civil Society".</div><div>Pro Se.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size: 11px; "><b><i>**(d) Cyberpiracy prevention = Domain Name, Mark, Trademark, as in a business Trade Name / Source Identifying Mark, without an explicit <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(84, 84, 84); font-family: arial, sans-serif; line-height: 16px; font-size: 12px; ">® designation required.</span></i></b></div></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#545454" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><b><i></i></b></span></font></div></body></html> Attachment:
Rule 20 = Exceptional and Extraordinary Circumstances..pdf <html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#545454" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 16px;"><b><i></i></b></span></font></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>
|