Against the IGOs and INGOs protected proposal

["ed" <ed@xxxxxxxx>]

Against the IGOs and INGOs protected proposal...

 

Dear ICANN,

Options already exist without the need to Grab or Take gTLD property that
already exists and put businesses and commercial interests at financial
peril. No need for that. Allow for a  dot IGO. ICANN has already allowed for
that to happen by the hundreds with new TLD's.

Now, changing a little "and" for "or" is a big deal. It opens up a whole new
interpretation. Why go there? 

These proposed changes do not reflect a wise move.

 

Thank you,

Ed Lehmann



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com