<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Commetns from KNET
- To: comments-lgr-second-level-10mar15 <comments-lgr-second-level-10mar15@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Commetns from KNET
- From: "jczhang@xxxxxxx" <jczhang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:38:26 +0800
Despite the good intention, we don't see the necessity to formulate the Label
Generation Rulesets (LGRs) for all second level domains at this time. The
current IDN tables and the related generation rules stated in every single
application document seem to be enough for PDT and RSEP.
We should first focus on the rules for the top level. Once the work on this
level is done, each registry is supposed to have full control of the LGRs at
the second level. We don't believe the differences in characters, variant,
contextual rules, and format constitute a problem that ICANN has to address
universally. By contrast, it is an issue that can be resolved at the
registration level. To reduce the ambiguity between different IDN TLDs, a
consensus on registration policy might work better.
Even the majority of the community thinks it is necessary, the timing might not
be good. Again, shouldn't we address this after we've completed the label
generation rules at the top level? Before any consensus is reached at this
level, it will be unfeasible to deal with the issue at the second level.
Kind regards
张建川 博士、高级研究员
Jian-Chuan Chang, Ph.D.
Sr. Research Fellow, KNET Co.
Tel: +86-10-8218-4187
Fax: +86-10-6250-6502
Email: jczhang@xxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|