create a severe penalty to deter Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

["James Wright, Ph.D." <jurydoctor@xxxxxxxxx>]

Currently there is a benefit in 'crap shoot' UDRPs but no real deterrent.  

 

The simple finding of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking does not represent an
adverse penalty when: 

1) there is no risk of financial loss; 

2) the general public never hears or cares; 

3) the potential benefit of obtaining a valuable domain name outweighs any
detriment.  

 

Moreover, panelists rarely impose the ruling of Reverse Domain Name
Hijacking even when warranted.

 

This current system needs a severe penalty to deter RDNH attempts.

 

Respectfully,

 

James Wright, Ph.D.

Jury Trial Consultants

Mock Trials . Jury Selection . Witness Communication . Consulting

 <http://www.jurytrialconsultants.com/> JuryTrialConsultants.com

 

1300 W 9th Street, Suite 1106

Cleveland, Ohio 44113

(216) 589-9988

 

Confidentiality Notice:

This email and any attachments may be confidential and protected by legal
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the email or any attachment is
prohibited.  If you have received this email in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the sender and then delete this copy and the
reply from your system.  Thank you.