<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Comment on CC application for constituency status.
- To: consumers-constituency-petition@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Comment on CC application for constituency status.
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:04:54 -0500
To the Board and the Structural Improvements Committee,
I am writing this in my personal capacity and not in my capacity as a member
and chair of the NCSG Executive Committee. The NCSG Executive Committee does
not have a consensus position on this topic.
While I do not support the Board approval of the Consumer Constituency (CC) at
this time, I want to make it clear that I strongly support the creation of a
Consumer Interest Group/Constituency* within the NCSG and, depending on the
nature of the final charter of the NCSG, may support a Consumer Interest
Group/Constituency in getting Board approval as an official Board approved
Constituency at some future time. I also want to say that I think that the
influence of consumer advocacy groups, both non-commercial and commercial in
ICANN is a critical necessity.
My reasons for requesting the rejection of the current application are varied,
and include:
1. The proposed constituency is not representative of the non-commercial
consumer organizations already present in the GNSO. The NCUC contains a number
of consumer organizations already. These NCUC/NCSG members have not, to my
knowledge, been consulted or included in the formation of this proposed
constituency. Additionally these consumer groups and individual advocates are
currently discussing the formation of a Consumer Advocacy
Interest-Group/Constituency within the structure of the NCSG. The creation of
a Consumer Constituency external and separate from the efforts going on in the
NCSG would be duplicative and would be a distraction to the formative efforts
of the NCSG and any incipient Consumer Advocacy Interest-Group/Constituency.
2. The membership criteria for this constituency are not clear. While the
petition and the charter are clear that industry funded consumer agencies would
not be eligible for membership it does not place any restrictions on the
membership basis of the various consumer organizations. Some consumer
organizations are predominantly composed of commercial members, while others
are citizen or non commercially based. Some are, in fact hybrid and have a mix
of members. In my opinion the membership criteria for a constituency with the
NCSG need to be clear in limiting participation to organizations that are
predominantly citizen or non-commercial in their membership. I believe there
is also room, and need, in the GNSO for consumer organizations that are
commercial in their membership, but believe that these groups should petition
to become part of the CSG, and not the NCSG.
3. The NCSG is still operating and developing under a temporary charter that
would make it disruptive to ongoing processes to fold a new Board approved
constituency into the new stakeholder group. The NCSG has established
membership in the NCSG as basic to the stakeholder group and to
Interest-Group/Constituency formation. Membership applications are being
accepted at this time. Further the NCUC is ready to devolve into a multitude of
Interest-Groups/Constituencies with the NCSG. As the only place for Non
Commercial entities over the years, it has gathered many different groups who
have many different advocacy concerns. With the formation of the NCSG, it is
the intention of many to try and spin out several
Interest-Groups/Constituencies who can each focus on their own non-commercial
agenda and participate in the GNSO processes as integral parts of the NCSG. If
a new Consumer Constituency is created at this point, it will put a stop to
this process and force the NCUC to remain a single large constituency. Not
only would this be counter-productive, it would help to foster some of the old
rivalries between the ALAC/Staff sponsored CC and the NCUC - rivalries that it
is necessary to move beyond.
4. It is my personal opinion that even if the final status of the permanent
NCSG charter were to require Board approved constituencies as opposed to
Interest-groups, it is important that a new group show its commitment to ICANN
and the GNSO before its existence be formalized. I would expect any group that
was being proposed to have already created a GNSO presence with mailing lists,
statements on substantive issues and general participation in the life of ICANN
and work of the GNSO. To date all that has been seen of the CC are the two
leaders, and while they have participated in some working groups either in
their own personal capacity or as ALAC representatives, there has been no
apparent attempt on their part to bring the greater group of prospective
members into the discussions and there have been no visible contributions from
a consensus voice of the proposed membership in the CC. I think that approving
a constituency before we have seen them take an active interest in the
substantive work, not just the process of becoming a constituency, is to put
the cart before the horse.
The NCSG has established membership criteria that make it possible for
consumer groups, and individual consumer advocates to join the NCSG directly
and to begin to make substantive contribution to the GNSO policy process
immediately. It is my fervent hope that the consumer groups in the NCSG,
including those already in the NCUC, and those who are part of the CC
application, will form together to create an Interest-Group/Constituency for
non commercial consumer advocacy. But for the reasons enumerated above, I
request that the Board not approve this constituency at this time, but rather
encourage them to join in the effort build the NCSG from the bottom-up.
Thank you
Avri Doria
Adjunct Professor
Luleå University of Technology
* While the status of the NCSG charter is still in flux, and given the
discrepancy between the NCUC's bottom-up plan for a charter that resembles
the charters in the Registries' and Registrars' SGs that includes Interest
Groups instead of formal Constituencies and the ICANN Policy Staff's intention
that the NCSG be organized along the same lines as the CSG with strictly
delineated constituencies, it has become the practice of the NCSG Executive
Committee to refer to Interest-Groups/Constituencies to cover this final status
dichotomy. It is the intention of the NCSG-EC in its work to date that within
the NCSG, formal constituencies like the NCUC and Interest-Groups, of which
there are several in the early stages of formation, will be treated as having
the same status with regard to Executive Committee and Policy Committee
participation and in all other relevant aspects. As part of the ongoing
charter work, definition of the internal structure of the NCSG is in progress,
and consumer groups are encouraged to participate with us in the bottom-up
process of completing the definition of the NCSG.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|