<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Domain Tasting is being abused
- To: domain-tasting-2008@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Domain Tasting is being abused
- From: Ben Bradshaw <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:15:29 +1200
First of all thank you for the opportunity to comment on Domain Tasting.
The concept of tasting is not a bad one, however it is being badly
abused by domain registrars themselves. I refer mostly to Network
Solutions, however I am sure they are no the only ones. It is clear that
Network Solutions has no intention of making a website on the domains
they are registering, instead they lock the domain to themselves for the
5 day grace period. This practice damages the credibility of the Domain
Name System. If a search of the DNS results in that domain being taken,
who nobody will want to search it in case they lose their name.
I registered my domain through a registrar that does not follow this
practice, in fact I searched many different names using a few New
Zealand registrars before purchasing. I did not have to consider
front-running, nor should I have to.
I do not see the potential benefits outweighing the potential issues
with tasting. I would request either strict regulation of tasting to
ensure honest testing and swift resolution of issues such as those with
Network Solutions or preferably removal of the entire system. A paid
grace period is also an option. A reduced cost for 5 days may reduce the
mass registrations that plague the system.
I do not see the cost of a single domain name as substantial, especially
when considering how much an advertiser can make. I am also biased due
to the fact that I don't intent to taste a domain name, but I can suffer
as a result of the system existing. I believe most individuals fall into
this category however.
In summary, I would prefer to see the ability to taste removed, or at
minimum restricted, either by cost or by control.
Thank you
Ben Bradshaw
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|