Re: [dssa] status/progress update - 1/1/2011

[Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mike,

The ccNSO Council will most likely agree on the ccNSO appointees at their
Council call on Tuesday, 12th next week.

Regarding the numbers of At-Large appointees - I hope this will be solved
within this week.

Gabi


On 4/6/11 3:01 PM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ah!  absolutely.  my apologies for getting ahead of the group on that...
> 
> do you have a sense of the likely timing?
> 
> by the way, this is a perfect example of a good conversation to switch over to
> our new "process" list.  ;-)
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Gabriella Schittek wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hello Mike,
>> 
>> Sorry to interfere, but I wonder if we could hold on a bit - the ccNSO DSSA
>> Working Group members have still not been selected and there is an issue
>> with the number of At-Large members which needs to be sorted. I.e. I think
>> it would be wise to wait until all DSSA members have been subscribed to the
>> email list and can join the developments on equal footing.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> Gabi
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/6/11 2:46 PM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> hi Glen (all you others can read over her shoulder),
>>> 
>>> here's the promised list of requests from us DSSA co-chairs.  let us know if
>>> any of these present a problem for you and we're retool our requests.  :-)
>>> 
>>> could you:
>>> 
>>> -- set up a separate mailing list for the co-chair/leadership discussion?
>>> our
>>> thought is to have a separate public/archived list for "process discussion"
>>> so
>>> as not to clutter up the main DSSA list with operational posts (like this
>>> one).  although the initial subscribers should be the staff and co-chairs,
>>> anybody else in the WG who is interested in following along are more than
>>> welcome to request to be subscribed tool.  the more the merrier.
>>> 
>>> -- post the names and affiliations to the WG members to the wiki page.  this
>>> is a pretty large group and we're thinking that would be a good step on the
>>> way to getting to know each other better.
>>> 
>>> -- start scheduling the first call of the working group.  we feel like we're
>>> close enough on the work plan to get the process under way.  maybe aim for
>>> the
>>> week after next?
>>> 
>>> -- kick off a poll to see how many of us are going to be attending Singapore
>>> (in preparation for deciding whether/how to do face-to-face meetings of the
>>> WG
>>> there).
>>> 
>>> thanks Glen!
>>> 
>>> mikey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>> phone  651-647-6109
>>> fax    866-280-2356
>>> web  http://www.haven2.com
>>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
>>> etc.)
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone  651-647-6109
> fax    866-280-2356
> web  http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
>