<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [dssa] status/progress update - 1/1/2011
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, Gabriella Schittek <gabriella.schittek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [dssa] status/progress update - 1/1/2011
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:42:08 -0700
Dear All,
I can set up a separate mailing list for the co-chair/leadership discussion?
our
>> thought is to have a separate public/archived list for "process discussion"
>> so
>> as not to clutter up the main DSSA list with operational posts (like this
>> one). although the initial subscribers should be the staff and co-chairs,
By the end of today, if you all agree?
Suggested name: ops-dssa@xxxxxxxxx?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: mercredi 6 avril 2011 15:02
To: Gabriella Schittek
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Bart Boswinkel; Julie Hedlund; Kristina Nordstrom;
Gisella Gruber-White; dssa@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [dssa] status/progress update - 1/1/2011
ah! absolutely. my apologies for getting ahead of the group on that...
do you have a sense of the likely timing?
by the way, this is a perfect example of a good conversation to switch over to
our new "process" list. ;-)
mikey
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:56 AM, Gabriella Schittek wrote:
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Sorry to interfere, but I wonder if we could hold on a bit - the ccNSO DSSA
> Working Group members have still not been selected and there is an issue
> with the number of At-Large members which needs to be sorted. I.e. I think
> it would be wise to wait until all DSSA members have been subscribed to the
> email list and can join the developments on equal footing.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Gabi
>
>
> On 4/6/11 2:46 PM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> hi Glen (all you others can read over her shoulder),
>>
>> here's the promised list of requests from us DSSA co-chairs. let us know if
>> any of these present a problem for you and we're retool our requests. :-)
>>
>> could you:
>>
>> -- set up a separate mailing list for the co-chair/leadership discussion?
>> our
>> thought is to have a separate public/archived list for "process discussion"
>> so
>> as not to clutter up the main DSSA list with operational posts (like this
>> one). although the initial subscribers should be the staff and co-chairs,
>> anybody else in the WG who is interested in following along are more than
>> welcome to request to be subscribed tool. the more the merrier.
>>
>> -- post the names and affiliations to the WG members to the wiki page. this
>> is a pretty large group and we're thinking that would be a good step on the
>> way to getting to know each other better.
>>
>> -- start scheduling the first call of the working group. we feel like we're
>> close enough on the work plan to get the process under way. maybe aim for
>> the
>> week after next?
>>
>> -- kick off a poll to see how many of us are going to be attending Singapore
>> (in preparation for deciding whether/how to do face-to-face meetings of the
>> WG
>> there).
>>
>> thanks Glen!
>>
>> mikey
>>
>>
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax 866-280-2356
>> web http://www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
>>
>>
>
>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|