ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[dssa]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [dssa] Information classification proposal

  • To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [dssa] Information classification proposal
  • From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:20:20 -0300

Thanks Julie, that's all that might be needed after all.

On 5/24/11 5:01 PM, Julie Hedlund wrote:
> Dear Rick, Carlos, and Bill,
>
> You may wish to refer to Annex B of the DSSA-WG Charter which includes
> information about the handling of proprietary information.  See:
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/7930080/DSSA-WG+Final+Draft+Charter+v1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1296034298000
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/7930080/DSSA-WG+Final+Draft+Charter+v1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1296034298000>.
> Annex B is on page 9.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julie
>
> Julie Hedlund
> ICANN Staff
>
>
> On 5/24/11 3:53 PM, "Rick Wesson" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>     First, I prefer that we only leverage publicly available
>     information and be as open and transparent as possable. While this
>     is my preference I understand some of you MAY wish to share
>     sensitive information. I propose that the Traffic Light Protocol
>     [1] may be optimal and that those desireing to share sensitive
>     information. I've participated in groups that this worked out
>     well, and is fairly intuitive.
>
>     [FROM WIKIPEDIA...]
>
>     There are four colors (or traffic lights):
>
>     RED - personal for named recipients only
>        In the context of a meeting, for example, RED information is
>     limited to those present at the meeting. In most circumstances,
>     RED information will be   
>       passed verbally or in person.
>
>     AMBER - limited distribution
>     The recipient may share AMBER information with others within their
>     organization, but only on a ‘need-to-know’ basis. The originator
>     may be expected to specify the intended limits of that sharing.
>
>     GREEN - community wide
>     Information in this category can be circulated widely within a
>     particular community. However, the information may not be
>     published or posted publicly on the Internet, nor released outside
>     of the community.
>
>      WHITE  - unlimited
>     Subject to standard copyright rules, WHITE information may be
>     distributed freely, without restriction.
>
>     -rick
>
>     [1] see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_Light_Protocol
>
>     2011/5/24 Carlos M. Martinez <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>         Hello everyone,
>
>         <disclaimer>
>         This is the first ICANN-related WG I'm involved with, so
>         perhaps this is
>         already covered somewhere. If so, please disregard :-)
>         </disclaimer>
>
>         As a possible idea geared towards facilitating and enabling
>         information
>         disclosure and exchange within the DSSA and its sub-WGs I
>         would like to
>         propose we consider using a lightweight information
>         classification scheme.
>
>         Under this proposal, a disclosing or contributing party SHOULD tag
>         documents with the keywords {public, reserved, confidential}.
>
>         Possible definitions for these terms would be:
>
>         - public: self-explanatory, information and data contained
>         within a
>         contribution can be made publicly accesible
>         - reserved: information and data contained within a
>         contribution is NOT
>         to be made publicly available but each member could share it
>         with the
>         constituency each represents
>         - confidential: information and data within a contribution is
>         to be
>         shared among DSSA members ONLY
>
>         We could work a little more on the definitions so they are most
>         applicable to our environment, these definitions are only "off
>         the top
>         of my head".
>
>         Given the amount of participants within the WG I think this
>         could help
>         all of us make sound decisions regarding information sharing
>         and could
>         offer disclosing parties a form to express sharing policy.
>
>         regards
>
>         Carlos
>         --
>
>         Carlos M. Martinez
>         LACNIC I+D
>         PGP KeyID 0xD51507A2
>         Phone: +598-2604-2222 ext. 4419
>         <tel:%2B598-2604-2222%20ext.%204419>
>
>
>

-- 
Carlos M. Martinez
LACNIC I+D
PGP KeyID 0xD51507A2
Phone: +598-2604-2222 ext. 4419

begin:vcard
fn:Carlos  Martinez Cagnazzo
n:Martinez Cagnazzo;Carlos 
email;internet:carlos@xxxxxxxxxx
tel;work:+598-2604-2222
tel;cell:+598-9-9245009
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy