[dssa] a thread for Dakar-meeting feedback

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi all,

here's a little thread where you can all post comments/feedback you receive 
during the course of the Dakar meeting.  i'll start it by passing along a 
couple of notes i took during the DSSA-update session at the GNSO yesterday.

Jeff Neuman (NeuStar, Registries, Vice-Chair of the GNSO Council) commented on 
our scope -- expressing concern that our scope is perhaps too narrow and may be 
misperceived by people outside the process as too focused on the root and TLD 
levels of the DNS.  he made the point that "DNS" means a much broader thing to 
many and they may be disappointed when they see our scope statement.  he 
encouraged us to, at a minimum, make our scope statement really clear in our 
final report

Bill Manning and James Galvin had a conversation about the mutual compatibility 
of  DNSSEC and DNS RPZ (here's a Paul Vixie blog post about RPZ - 
https://www.isc.org/community/blog/201007/taking-back-dns-0).  Bill started 
with a comment that the two may be an either/or choice, that they may not be 
compatible with each other.  James questioned that.  Bill responded with 
reference to a very recent interaction with Paul V. in which Paul said he 
didn't know how to make the two approaches coexist.  

any other comments/ideas/feedback that people are hearing?  are you finding 
copies of our "one pager" helpful?  

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)