ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[dssa]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [dssa] a thread for Dakar-meeting feedback

  • To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, dssa@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: [dssa] a thread for Dakar-meeting feedback
  • From: Greg Aaron <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:52:33 -0400

Dear Mike:

Thanks.  The GNSO passed the WG's charter, which says: "2.2 Scope of
Activities: The DSSA‐WG should limit its activities to considering issues
at the root and top level domains within the framework of ICANN’s
coordinating role in managing Internet naming  and numbering resources as
stated in its Mission in its Bylaws."

That seems pretty clear.  A change would require the GNSO and the ccNSO
councils to agree to it.

All best,
--Greg




-----Original Message-----
From: Mike O'Connor [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 11:21 AM
To: dssa@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [dssa] a thread for Dakar-meeting feedback


hi all,

here's a little thread where you can all post comments/feedback you
receive during the course of the Dakar meeting.  i'll start it by passing
along a couple of notes i took during the DSSA-update session at the GNSO
yesterday.

Jeff Neuman (NeuStar, Registries, Vice-Chair of the GNSO Council)
commented on our scope -- expressing concern that our scope is perhaps too
narrow and may be misperceived by people outside the process as too
focused on the root and TLD levels of the DNS.  he made the point that
"DNS" means a much broader thing to many and they may be disappointed when
they see our scope statement.  he encouraged us to, at a minimum, make our
scope statement really clear in our final report

Bill Manning and James Galvin had a conversation about the mutual
compatibility of  DNSSEC and DNS RPZ (here's a Paul Vixie blog post about
RPZ - https://www.isc.org/community/blog/201007/taking-back-dns-0).  Bill
started with a comment that the two may be an either/or choice, that they
may not be compatible with each other.  James questioned that.  Bill
responded with reference to a very recent interaction with Paul V. in
which Paul said he didn't know how to make the two approaches coexist.

any other comments/ideas/feedback that people are hearing?  are you
finding copies of our "one pager" helpful?

mikey


- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109
fax             866-280-2356
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
etc.)




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy