<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] Additional Proposal
- Subject: RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] Additional Proposal
- From: "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:20:42 -0600
We can certainly come up with parameters to identify who is a legitimate
service provider for the context of the access -- but the fact remains
that service providers provide an important function in the anti-fraud,
brand protection arena that merits discussion and access. The bulk
access agreement can address abuse and termination rights by those that
don't comply with the terms of the agreement.
Margie
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 1:20 PM
Cc: gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Additional Proposal
Margie Milam wrote:
> All:
>
>
>
> Attached is an additional proposal which provides access for service
> providers that use WHOIS for legitimate purposes. There may be some
> cross-over with respect to other proposals, but I added specifics to
> address the unique aspects related to service providers.
This is just broad enough to include most everyone. I didn't read it any
further than "self certify that they offer anti-fraud services".
Tucows.com, our shareware download service, provides anti-fraud software
for download - would this allow us to legitimately self-certify?
We could just make this easier on everyone and instead give everyone
unfettered access to all of our sensitive customer data as long as they
self-certify that they won't do bad things with the data.
I think this proposal needs some further refinement before it merits
serious consideration.
-ross
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|