ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-acc-sgb]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

FW: [gnso-acc-sgb] Private vs. business Whois

  • To: <gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: FW: [gnso-acc-sgb] Private vs. business Whois
  • From: "Natris, Wout de" <W.deNatris@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 09:08:43 +0200

Jeff and all,
 
Find below my answers to Erics questions off list.
 
Wout

________________________________

Van: Natris, Wout de 
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 mei 2007 16:35
Aan: 'Hugh Dierker'
Onderwerp: RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] Private vs. business Whois


To be complete. We work from a couple of forms of complaints:
 
a. consumers. Visit our website at www.spamklacht.nl, where they can
file complaints;
b. tips from businesses, e.g. ISPs or Microsoft;
c. national cooperation, e.g. police;
d. international cooperation, foreign complaints referred to OPTA
containing a Dutch connection;
e. own research, especially on malware.
 
Hope this helps,
 
Wout

________________________________

Van: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx] 
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 mei 2007 16:23
Aan: Natris, Wout de
Onderwerp: RE: [gnso-acc-sgb] Private vs. business Whois


Now I almost am certain what you mean. One more question; multiple
complaints from whom? Consumers?
 
By the way, OPTA seems to have a perfect charter for third party access.
 
Eric

"Natris, Wout de" <W.deNatris@xxxxxxx> wrote:

        No, by OPTA as LEA. We only start an investigation on spam or
malware after we receive multiple complaints.
         
        Wout

________________________________

        Van: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Verzonden: dinsdag 22 mei 2007 16:09
        Aan: Natris, Wout de; gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx
        Onderwerp: Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Private vs. business Whois
        
        
        Pardon but do you mean complaints received by registrars?
         
        Eric
        
        "Natris, Wout de" <W.deNatris@xxxxxxx> wrote:

                John and others,
                
                The private/business approach would definitely be
useful. There's one
                but from a EU privacy point of view. The name of the
employee who is
                mentioned as contactperson, etc. in the Whois data is
concidered private
                also.
                
                For OPTA this distinction is fine as long the privacy
sensitive
                information is accessable for LEAs in a form of tiered
access after
                complaints on a website are received.
                
                Best,
                
                Wout
                
                -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
                Van: owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx] Namens John
Levine
                Verzonden: dinsdag 22 mei 2007 7:13
                Aan: gnso-whois-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                Onderwerp: Re: [gnso-whois-wg] GAC's position on Whois
                
                >>>> "Suzanne Sene" 5/18/2007 10:52 AM >>>
                >>access to whois data in support of those activities is
legal in the 
                >>united states. in other words, there is no
inconsistency between 
                >>public access to whois data and national laws.
                >
                >in the above sentence, insert "U.S." between "whois
data and" and 
                >"national laws"
                
                Good point. But then add:
                
                "or anywhere else, for the vast majority of domains that
are registered
                by businesses and organizations rather than
individuals."
                
                It is my impression that most places consider people to
have
                considerably more privacy rights than organizations.
Even here in the
                U.S., if I rent a box at the post office, if I rent it
as myself my
                physical info is private, if I rent it as a business
it's not.
                
                Most domains are registered by businesses. All the ones
used for
                phishing and scams are businesses by definition. We
could make our lives
                a whole lot easier if we treated organizational and
individual
                registrants differently, and redacted the contact info
for the people
                who, by law and custom, can reasonably expect that, and
not for the
                organizations that don't.
                
                R's,
                John
                
                
                +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
                Disclaimer
                Dit e-mailbericht kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten
of informatie die is beschermd door een beroepsgeheim.
                Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, wijzen wij u
erop dat elke vorm van verspreiding, vermenigvuldiging
                of ander gebruik ervan niet is toegestaan.
                Indien dit bericht blijkbaar bij vergissing bij u
terecht is gekomen, verzoeken wij u ons daarvan
                direct op de hoogte te stellen via tel.nr 070 315 3500
of e-mail mailto:mail@xxxxxxx en het bericht te vernietigen.
                Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend gecontroleerd op
virussen.
                OPTA aanvaardt geen enkele aansprakelijkheid voor de
feitelijke inhoud en juistheid van dit bericht en er kunnen 
                geen rechten aan worden ontleend.
                
                
                This e-mail message may contain confidential information
or information protected by professional privilege.
                If it is not intended for you, you should be aware that
any distribution, copying or other form of use of
                this message is not permitted.
                If it has apparently reached you by mistake, we urge you
to notify us by phone +31 70 315 3500
                or e-mail mailto:mail@xxxxxxx and destroy the message
immediately.
                This e-mail message has only been checked for viruses.
                The accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of
the information provided cannot be guaranteed.
                OPTA expressly disclaims any responsibility in relation
to the information in this e-mail message.
                No rights can be derived from this message.
                
                
                


________________________________

        Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49982/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/m
ailbeta/newmail_tools.html> 
        Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49982/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/m
ailbeta/newmail_tools.html> 
        
        

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
Dit e-mailbericht kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten of informatie
die is beschermd door een beroepsgeheim.
Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, wijzen wij u erop dat elke
vorm van verspreiding, vermenigvuldiging
of ander gebruik ervan niet is toegestaan.
Indien dit bericht blijkbaar bij vergissing bij u terecht is gekomen,
verzoeken wij u ons daarvan
direct op de hoogte te stellen via tel.nr 070 315 3500 of e-mail
mailto:mail@xxxxxxx en het bericht te vernietigen.
Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend gecontroleerd op&n bsp;virussen.
OPTA aanvaardt geen enkele aansprakelijkheid voor de feitelijke inhoud
en juistheid van dit bericht en er kunnen 
geen rechten aan worden ontleend.


This e-mail message may contain confidential information or information
protected by professional privilege.
If it is not intended for you, you should be aware that any
distribution, copying or other form of use of
this message is not permitted.
If it has apparently reached you by mistake, we urge you to notify us by
phone +31 70 315 3500
or e-mail mailto:mail@xxxxxxx and destroy the  message immediately.
This e-mail message has only been checked for viruses.
The accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of the information
provided cannot be guaranteed.
OPTA expressly disclaims any responsibility in relation to the
information in this e-mail message.
No rights can be derived from this message.     


Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48517/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo
_panel_invite.asp?a=7 hot CTA = Join our Network Research Panel

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer
Dit e-mailbericht kan vertrouwelijke informatie bevatten of informatie die is 
beschermd door een beroepsgeheim.
Indien dit bericht niet voor u is bestemd, wijzen wij u erop dat elke vorm van 
verspreiding, vermenigvuldiging
of ander gebruik ervan niet is toegestaan.
Indien dit bericht blijkbaar bij vergissing bij u terecht is gekomen, verzoeken 
wij u ons daarvan
direct op de hoogte te stellen via tel.nr 070 315 3500 of e-mail 
mailto:mail@xxxxxxx en het bericht te vernietigen.
Dit e-mailbericht is uitsluitend gecontroleerd op virussen.
OPTA aanvaardt geen enkele aansprakelijkheid voor de feitelijke inhoud en 
juistheid van dit bericht en er kunnen 
geen rechten aan worden ontleend.


This e-mail message may contain confidential information or information 
protected by professional privilege.
If it is not intended for you, you should be aware that any distribution, 
copying or other form of use of
this message is not permitted.
If it has apparently reached you by mistake, we urge you to notify us by phone 
+31 70 315 3500
or e-mail mailto:mail@xxxxxxx and destroy the message immediately.
This e-mail message has only been checked for viruses.
The accuracy, relevance, timeliness or completeness of the information provided 
cannot be guaranteed.
OPTA expressly disclaims any responsibility in relation to the information in 
this e-mail message.
No rights can be derived from this message.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy