Re: Fw: [gnso-acc-sgb] Report for today

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,
  No I do not want an operator in the borad sense. I want a hands on worker who 
can tell us what is required. Until I am confident with that then I can't get 
comfy with suggesting changes. 
   
  Eric

jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
    body{font-family: 
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: 
#ffffff;color: black;}      Dr. Dierker and all sgb members,
   
    I don't believe an "operator" would be able to provide that information, 
unless
  you are referring to a registrar or registry operator in the borad sense.  A 
  registrar manager or registry manager should be able to provide an estimate
  however.
  


  -----Original Message----- 
From: Hugh Dierker 
Sent: May 28, 2007 2:29 PM 
To: Jeff Williams , gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: Fw: [gnso-acc-sgb] Report for today 

  I would be interested to hear from an actual hands on operator of port 43 and 
her analysis of costing.
   
  Eric

Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Margie and all sgb members,

I see and agree with your and Ross's concern regarding costs to
be covered.
Do you have a suggestion as to how such costs can be managed
and still provide for checks and balances so registrants and consumers
privacy is not abused or misused?

In my view, registrars should not be assuming any of these costs,
nor should consumers, and I see no need for them to do so as it
is not their interests which are being served here. Rather third
party wanna be's and LEA's interests are the interests whom are
being more greatly served, ergo they should shoulder the bulk of
the costs in terms of fees for certification, ect. without the ability
to pass such costs on to consumers. This will give these wanna be
third parties and incentive to behaive responsibly and give consumers
some level of peace of mind.

Margie Milam wrote:

> In my view, cost prohibitive would be something that would require
> a
> significant r&d effort or shift in operations on the part of
> registrars
> to accommodate, without no apparent way to recoup the costs.
>
>
>
> All registrars rely on software, either internally developed or
> licensed
> from a third party, to perform their domain name registrations. My
> point is that in developing a WHOIS solution, we need to take this
> into
> account. Anything that would require a manual process, such as
> reviewing affidavits or faxes or other documentation may not be
> scaleable, when you are talking about millions of WHOIS records.
>
>
>
>
>
> Margie
>
>

  Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827




 
---------------------------------
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.