ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-acc-sgb]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Fwd: Contribution from the Tiered Access Group for the Whois WG

  • To: Milton Mueller <Mueller@xxxxxxx>, gnso-acc-sgb@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-acc-sgb] Fwd: Contribution from the Tiered Access Group for the Whois WG
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 17:50:57 -0700 (PDT)

I read the thing and it is an easy read.
   
  And I don't necessarily prefer going over well trod ground just for the 
exercises. But two concepts leaped off the pages at me "Brand Protection" and 
"Intellectual property control".
  Brings me back to "ip lawyers" in our proposals, which I do not remember 
really being debated here.
   
  But mainly the problem here is protocol. This document did not emanate from 
this WG and it therefore should not be appended.
   
  If we allow this one to be appended I must insist on equal time and I will 
put together a one pager.
   
  Eric
   
  

Milton Mueller <Mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:
  David:
The TAG report is now transmitted to SGB. I thought it had been
transmitted back on May 24 when we first received the report, but
apparently it wasn't. 

>>> "David W. Maher" 5/30/2007 11:14 AM >>>
Milton and Maria:
I am forwarding a msg previously sent by Chuck Gomes of the "Tiered 
Access Group" to Philip Sheppard. We understand that this was 
transmitted to SubGroup B.
I would like to make sure that it becomes part of the record and 
report of the SubGroup.
Could you let me know whether it will be part of the Appendix to the 
Report or elsewhere?
thanx
David



 
---------------------------------
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy