RE: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: Questioins regarding proposed AoC Review

["Caroline Greer" <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Chuck.
 
Glen, do we have a time yet for our call tomorrow?
 
Many thanks.
 
Caroline.
 
From: owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: 12 January 2010 01:35
To: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-arr-dt] FW: Questioins regarding proposed AoC Review
 
FYI
 
Chuck
 
________________________________

From: Gomes, Chuck 
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 8:35 PM
To: 'Peter Dengate Thrush'; 'Janis Karklins'
Cc: Denise Michel
Subject: Questioins regarding proposed AoC Review
Peter/Janis,
 
The GNSO Council is presently reviewing the draft Staff proposal for the AoC 
with the intent of submitting comments.  To enable us to prepare our comments 
as well as to guide us in the need for the GNSO to endorse volunteers from our 
community for the AoC review teams, we would appreciate any clarity you can 
provide regarding the following:
*          One central issue is the role of the SOs in selecting RT members - 
is this to be viewed as an initial filtering process for the benefit of the 
Selectors and how much emphasis will the Selectors put on the endorsements?  
*           Are the Selectors in a position to give early insight into the 
selection criteria that they will use? This will greatly assist the GNSO [and 
other SOs] in its own selection process and will help ensure that we are not 
all working at odds with one another.
*           What degree of independence will the RT members be expected to show 
from their SOs? Are they expected to be direct representatives in some way, 
high level communicators or independent actors?
Chuck Gomes