[gnso-arr-dt] FW: Questioins regarding proposed AoC Review

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

FYI
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: Gomes, Chuck 
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 8:35 PM
To: 'Peter Dengate Thrush'; 'Janis Karklins'
Cc: Denise Michel
Subject: Questioins regarding proposed AoC Review


Peter/Janis,
 
The GNSO Council is presently reviewing the draft Staff proposal for the
AoC with the intent of submitting comments.  To enable us to prepare our
comments as well as to guide us in the need for the GNSO to endorse
volunteers from our community for the AoC review teams, we would
appreciate any clarity you can provide regarding the following:
*          One central issue is the role of the SOs in selecting RT
members - is this to be viewed as an initial filtering process for the
benefit of the Selectors and how much emphasis will the Selectors put on
the endorsements?  

*           Are the Selectors in a position to give early insight into
the selection criteria that they will use? This will greatly assist the
GNSO [and other SOs] in its own selection process and will help ensure
that we are not all working at odds with one another.

*           What degree of independence will the RT members be expected
to show from their SOs? Are they expected to be direct representatives
in some way, high level communicators or independent actors?

Chuck Gomes