[gnso-arr-dt] Review Team Nominee Selection Process

[William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello,

I don't know about anyone else here, but I asked NCSG members for input a few 
days ago and have received none.  Nor have I seen any input from the Council 
list.  So I guess we should just get started brainstorming here....

We need to define a fair methodology for taking in, evaluating, and deciding 
among applications, e.g. 

1.  What individual qualifications are required, and how to fairly assess 
council vs non-council candidates
2.  What kind of distribution we want to present to the Selectors (we'd talked 
about one from each SG, but there are interested parties who don't necessarily 
fit into any one SG, and other complexities)
3.  Who will select nominees from the candidate pool using what method
4.  etc

Below a suggestion from Avri to maybe help start the conversation.

Bill

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> Date: January 29, 2010 8:38:06 PM GMT+01:00
> To: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Fwd: [] Input to the Affirmation Reviews Requirements drafting team 
> by COB Monday 1 February 2010
> 
> my recommendation is something like
> 
> each SG can put forward up to 3 names 
> the names do not need to be SG members but can be
> 
> and the houses will vote 
>      2 votes per council member (1 vote max for a candidate)
> (assuming you get 2 seats, number of votes = number of seats)
>   
> the top 2 from each house will be presented as nominees 
> with a request from the CEO/Chair to pick one from house a) and one from 
> house b.
> 
> with the rest ranked as alternates or members of the advisory or whatever.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: 29 January 2010 12:56:58 EST
>> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [council] Input to the Affirmation Reviews Requirements drafting 
>> team by COB Monday 1 February 2010
>> 
>> Dear Councillors,
>>  
>> Reminder about an action item that arose out of the Council meeting on 
>> Thursday 28 January 2010 with regard to the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) 
>> Review. Please provide early input to the drafting team, via the Council 
>> mailing list, on any ideas you have on how GNSO volunteers should be 
>> identified as nominees for each of the four review teams.
>>  
>> Action Item:
>>  
>> • The Council agreed that the drafting team, under the leadership of Bill 
>> Drake, should continue working on how GNSO volunteers should be identified 
>> as nominees for each of the four review teams.
>>  
>>  
>> • The procedures should be presented to the Council on 10 February, 8 days 
>> before the Council meeting on 18 February 2010 for approval.
>>  
>>  
>> • Councillors and stakeholder Groups are requested to provide input to the 
>> drafting team by COB on Monday, 1 February 2010.
>>  
>> Thank you.
>> Kind regards,
>>  
>> Glen
>>  
>> Glen de Saint Géry
>> GNSO Secretariat
>> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://gnso.icann.org
>>  
>>  
> 

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************