<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
- To: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:59:33 -0500
Thanks Rafik. How would you suggest changing the process? The proposed
wording is: "No more than two volunteers should come from the same
geographical region." The key word is "should"; that was intentional
because if there are not qualified, volunteers from enough geographic
regions, what would we do? The goal would be to not have more that two
from any one region, but that may not be achievable.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:03 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO
endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers
Hi Chuck,
"have less than three geographic regions represented.
".
I am uncomfortable with this point because in practice some
regions wasn't enough represented and this will allow the status quo for
RT.
if it is not late, no objection for extension.
Regards
rafik
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|