Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement of AoC Review Team Volunteers

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck,

I don't think that we can compromise in that point as the ongoing
internationalization of ICANN is critical and I guess that is subject to
accountability too.
with a real constraint, we may urge SGs to involve their members from
less-represented regions.
the same case may happen somehow for gender balance too.

Regards

Rafik

2010/2/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Thanks Rafik.  How would you suggest changing the process?  The proposed
> wording is: "No more than two volunteers should come from the same
> geographical region."  The key word is "should"; that was intentional
> because if there are not qualified, volunteers from enough geographic
> regions, what would we do?  The goal would be to not have more that two from
> any one region, but that may not be achievable.
>
> Chuck
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 04, 2010 2:03 AM
>
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* gnso-arr-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-arr-dt] Some ideas for a process for GNSO endorsement
> of AoC Review Team Volunteers
>
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
>
>    "have less than three geographic regions represented. ".
>>
>>
>
> I am uncomfortable with this point because in practice some regions wasn't
> enough represented and this will allow the status quo for RT.
>
> if it is not late, no objection for extension.
>
> Regards
>
> rafik
>
>